Suella Braverman tells the US Heritage Foundation we should have "the courage" to ask whether the UK could be an Islamist-run nuclear theocracy in 20 years ***regardless" of whether one thinks that is a realistic outcome*** [which she does not think it is].
What's courageous about that?
What's courageous about that?
Comments
But at best this kind of *flooding the zone* wastes our time.
At worst it distorts political discourse.
The effect of promoting this Islamist takeiver threat narrative is likely to stoke fears & threat perceptions - esp among a segment of public which much exaggerates the pace of Muslim population growth + is prone to sweeping stereotypes of Muslims
Has anyone checked her hard drive?
* the growth of UK Muslim population = a security threat to America
* British Muslims will mostly want domination, not integration
* it is possible/likely that UK institutions, political parties & non-Muslim citizens will support/appease Islamism
In a normal country, inviting the world’s largest, and newly belligerent superpower to think of her own country in the same way it views one of its currently-perceived biggest military threats, should attract accusations of reckless, idiotic, endangering treason. Putz.
too dissimilar to that of Iran today..."
Are in you in the pocket of the Soupdragon?
The world gets stranger.
For a public figure that takes courage.