Obviously wider taxation of the exchange of PD is not desirable and I wouldn't advocate for that anyway. Would be a distraction for the authorities.
Though, it hadn't occurred to me before that tax authorities could be mobilized for the cause of privacy even in the absence of privacy laws.
Though, it hadn't occurred to me before that tax authorities could be mobilized for the cause of privacy even in the absence of privacy laws.
Comments
Also, in general, let's just rinse them ;)
Or alternatively take the UK's (possible) approach.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8j0dgym8w1o