Extremely short-sighted and irresponsible. I'm disappointed Schrems continues to give credence to the idea. You absolutely can take all the teeth out of the GDPR while still complying with the Charter. And good luck stricking down amendments through the CJEU.
https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-gdpr-privacy-law-europe-president-ursula-von-der-leyen/
https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-gdpr-privacy-law-europe-president-ursula-von-der-leyen/
Comments
In other words, documentation you would have to produce anyway if you were
That's not to say that nothing can be stricken from the GDPR but that stuff is comparatively minor.
If EC actually wanted to lessen the burden on SMEs they'd move some of the responsibility upstream such as
Larger processors should also be under an obligation to make sure their data processing
Lastly, let's not forget about GDPR's weirdness at the outskirts of its scope that covers regular individuals (e.g. when posting on social media) and sole traders.
They should not be excluded from the scope and most
Alas, EC primarily wants a bonfire. Thanks but no thanks, Draghi.
And SMEs and small controllers often aren't fined anyway 🤷♂️
Those of us working in the field know that the GDPR is (mostly) flexible and scalable by nature.
These proposals seem unlikely to help anybody, least of all data subjects.
Agreed data subjects will be hurt. Non-existent exemptions (like pretending
#trustmatters
#dataprotectionmatters
#privacymatters
#datasubjectsmatter
#humanrightsmatter #digitaltrustmatters
https://whoisdtrust.me
#iamdtrust
Does the EC really want a lobbying onslaught? Because that's what they're gonna get, including potential US interference and attempts at softening the law for AI-related processing
That's the right way to apply principles-based human rights protections.