Interesting to see how he hasn't even required that because the other two branches of government don't seem the least bit interested in stopping him. But yeah, have fun being "technically correct" about the rules. That's much better than being dead wrong about reality.
what you are learning with this line of questioning is that the law isn't what you make it up in your head to be, it is decided by what HAPPENS not by what's SAID. the US legal system works off precident, not intent. what you are doing is the democrat equivalent of sovereign citizen bullshit.
Well put. What matters is what happens, not what's said. So let's, as a country, make sure that as little as possible of what he says happens. Or at least happens the way he wants it.
Lol that's exactly what the op was talking about. he's doing it. there is no "as a country" because 1/3 of the country wants it, 1/3 refused to do anything about it, and the last 1/3 has no power.
you're so concerned about the letter of the law you ignore the spirit of it. "when he decided everyone was female did it happen?!" no, fucking of course not. instead the thing he wanted to happen happened - he marginalized trans people further and stripped us of the right to self identify
lol the spirit of the law is that precedent supercedes personal ick.
Trump's eo didn't "make everyone a woman" and anyone who thinks it did is an idiot. what it did was strip trans people of their rights. that actually happened. your rulebook is useless when you're the only one who follows it
Comments
He can order men with guns to try to enforce these orders, and they might even obey him, but the orders themselves are meaningless.
Trump's eo didn't "make everyone a woman" and anyone who thinks it did is an idiot. what it did was strip trans people of their rights. that actually happened. your rulebook is useless when you're the only one who follows it