Wow. If facial reactions can tell us anything, ACB does not appear to be a Trump sycophant. Certainly she’s not wearing the admiring submission of Thomas et al. - ThreadSky

johnwdean.bsky.social • 29 days ago

Wow. If facial reactions can tell us anything, ACB does not appear to be a Trump sycophant. Certainly she’s not wearing the admiring submission of Thomas et al.

Reposted from Ron Filipkowski

ACB ruled against Trump again? Who could’ve imagined it?

Comments

keepingfaithnow.bsky.social•26 days ago

Bret doesn’t look to happy either!

katelarkworthyillo.bsky.social•29 days ago

👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

umpref13.bsky.social•29 days ago

I have a suspicion she will be more like Kagan.

ddvaia.bsky.social•25 days ago

badmamajama.bsky.social•29 days ago

I noticed this as well! I’m not a fan of her rulings but at what point does enough become enough 🤷‍♀️

someguy2024.bsky.social•26 days ago

Little did Trump and McConnell know that when they jammed her on the court, in violation of McConnell's own made up rule that he used against Barack Obama, that they were putting today's version of Sandra Day O'Connor on the court. The irony is delicious and fun to watch.

greenhombre.bsky.social•29 days ago

Looks like she got a strong whiff of his diaper.

wastelandsedge.bsky.social•29 days ago

Seems like this one:

harrissocal.bsky.social•26 days ago

Four more years of this, she could be a 21st century Earl Warren.
That would upset Leo.

rbsnst.bsky.social•29 days ago

She looks disgusted

theeagles.bsky.social•29 days ago

Finally!

deronjoe.bsky.social•26 days ago

Mr Dean & Mr Filipkowski--

With all due respect.
What's the point of this exercise?
A grainy cut out picture of a split second of time.
How is this moving any ball, in any direction?
How is this substantive?
You are grown ass men older than I am, what the hell are you doing?