Ever since law school, I've always thought the actual case or controversy requirement of federal litigation was extremely stupid. We can't challenge zombie laws that are unconstitutional until someone actually decides to abuse it and by then it's too late.
I'm talking about the Allen Enemies Act.
I'm talking about the Allen Enemies Act.
Comments
*Its
If not but for Marbury v. Madison, there is no legal basis for the Supreme Court’s judicial review and must be considered advisory (and has not been codified either).
election. Millions of Blacks were denied their right to
vote.
Palasthttps://chicagocrusader.com/palast-voter-suppression-cost-harris-the-2024-presidential-election/
I know you meant Alien Enemies Act. I'm just being stupid.
You are correct, it's a stupid way of doing things. A more dutiful congress would help a lot in addressing this stuff beforehand. They should have repealed or amended this act a long time ago.
(But yes I agree that some laws deserve repealing that should have gotten the axe decades ago)
Noone can enforce the Emoulements Clause, which the Founding Fathers were hugely concerned about, because noone can show they were personally harmed by the violation of it.
Clinton could’ve done this. And Obama too.