I would guess that most (not all!) 1A academics become 1A academics because they reflexively prioritize speech above competing interests. Cases like this suggest why that might be a problem for academia and 1A scholarship.
Reposted from
Dave Hoffman
The gap between academic 1A consensus on TikTok (which has been, generally, that the law is unconstitutional) judges' opinions in the DC Circuit and the questions today reminds me a ton of the individual mandate discourse in Sebelius.
Comments