No, I'm not a terrible communicator. I just think quite differently than many, and people are making broad assumptions of intent, while I'm being very literal and operating within the confines of a strict word-count.
No, you haven’t explained it in a way that makes sense to human beings, which is why people keep asking you about it and pointing out that you are a terrible communicator.
Remember, people can’t read your mind, you have to actually type the words out.
“Automated” isn’t clear.
Given two factors: human and machine.
Humans design rules, humans enact
Machines design rules with human input, machines enact
Human designs, machine enacts
Machine designs with human input, humans enact
I'm saying we can write the statutes in such a way that we can use logistics software for venue determination and case assignments, with an emphasis on a balance of fairness to all parties.
That isn’t what anyone was questioning, though. We were asking about your assertion that there can be some automated system to determine whether a judge has a conflict of interest.
And case assignments are already randomized, why are you not aware of that?
Comments
Like here. If you don’t expect AI to do it, what is the magical process you’re imagining? Use your words.
I'm assuming the way the word count divides the discussion into multiple parts is to blame for why you didn't see it.
Remember, people can’t read your mind, you have to actually type the words out.
The logistics of venue determination and judicial assignments don't require learning software.
What can be automated should be automated: that's the least bias.
So far you have been very unwilling to actually explain what you mean
You keep hand waving and saying well we could
Given two factors: human and machine.
Humans design rules, humans enact
Machines design rules with human input, machines enact
Human designs, machine enacts
Machine designs with human input, humans enact
Automate what and how?
I'm not saying we should use AI to decide cases.
And case assignments are already randomized, why are you not aware of that?