If many others are available, why bother banning these ones?
But I mean the same logic can be applied to banning just about anything else, as long as some alternative is available.
But I mean the same logic can be applied to banning just about anything else, as long as some alternative is available.
Comments
"who needs 6 (or 10) shots to kill a deer!" wail the soccer moms who know nothing about hunting
Bet anything that accepts an AR (or other mag with a capacity of over 5) gets the ban. Instead of having to specifically name them all.
What's wrong with y'all? ☺️
I'll give up hunting with guns if you give it up 😁
Not to mention everything else women did before that they can't now lol
What I do care about is Canada's gun licensing process. It's pretty good. Could be better, but it's not bad. I also care about our gun carry laws - there's very few circumstances where carrying a gun is legal or acceptable.
Like you said, clearly its working. From 2000 to 2020, legal gun owners were accused of only 12 homicides annually on avg
There are things that are starting to be taken more seriously now in the screening, and in society at large. Like DV. Thats good. These are changes that will save lives.
$342 mil on bans? No.