About 3, our concept is precisely history plus mechanism. It's the BSC that's rejected half. I can imagine a BSCer might think that we're preferring history just because we insist on it. But, we're also insisting on mechanism.
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
If we seek a history/mechanism balance, why do we spend so much time talking about history? Of 4 constituencies, BSCers, coalesc.-phylogeog., phylogeneticists, & taxonomists we expected strong resistance only from the BSCers, and so focused our strongest arguments there.
Comments