I'm kind of glad both readings exist, because in this form, it's just a contradiction to the "there are only two sexes," and when they try to wiggle out by either going, "developing to be..." or "genetically," they are slapped with, "well, female then." Makes this definition even worse to defend.
Look, woman might now be legally defined by the United States government according to one’s sexual potential at conception, but Lads is still a state of mind.
Even weirder: According to biology, which states that at conception there is no determined sex until further development, everyone in the US has had their biological sex negated.
Comments
I would fail miserably
(d) "Female" means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the large reproductive cell.
(e) "Male" means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the small reproductive cell.
but apparently those definitions are laughable anyways
((tho I'd like to understand better))