The one's that piss me off the most are those that "scream detrimental to wildlife", when, in cases, such as this it is not true. What they really mean, is that it's going to spoil my view and depreciate the value of my house.
Yes, of course it’s a site by site basis, I know of applications where they wanted to put solar panels on lakes which I can’t see being good for birds, but on a field that’s been a monoculture (especially rye grass), I can’t see it causing significant harm in most cases.
Comments