An important new study, out today, uses the latest physical & social science -- also meta-review machine-learning something something -- to reassess the social cost of carbon.
TL;DR: it's $280/ton, way higher than EPA's $190.
https://www.ucdavis.edu/climate/news/high-cost-carbon
TL;DR: it's $280/ton, way higher than EPA's $190.
https://www.ucdavis.edu/climate/news/high-cost-carbon
Comments
https://bsky.app/profile/volts.wtf/post/3ldjs7svun22s
I don't think having an SCC number is helpful. It's deceptive; makes things look easier than they are.
Interestingly, that cover photo is not fossil coal, it's carbonized wood. Embiggen and you can see the wood grain. It's biochar!
Seems appropriate if a little unusual to see