Luckily for you, this user has compiled a thread of her tweets that all but says "any royalties from HP affirms my cause" very smugly: https://bsky.app/profile/taio.bsky.social/post/3lphrppy7vc2m
Reposted from
Daniel Lee 🔜 Magic Con Las Vegas
I am extremely sympathetic to this concern, so I spent a while digging into this with a burner Twitter account. I was unsuccessful in finding anything that says, explicitly, "people buying my stuff means they agree with me"
That said, 1/
That said, 1/
Comments
That wasn’t my question.
My question was why does anyone believe she is correctly knowing the beliefs of her consumers?
I’m not sure how else to restate this so people stop jumping to every other issue with her.
So if they are complicit, to what degree?
Handing a murderer a knife is a different situation if the one doing that knows or believes them to be a murderer vs. neither of those.