We should definitely treat the enemy's delusional aspirations as 100% certain to be enacted. We can ignore all talk of mechanisms or logistics and focus entirely on how terrifying this is, a thing Trump definitely does not want you to do
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
But beyond that, dunno what to tell you man, the good options all ran out in November 2024, now it's bad options, how bad an option are you willing to consider here, is the question
Because let's be real: if you're worried about the safety of elections, it might be a good idea to have some notion of how those work, but also, this is the situation where you _actually have to run to the center_ strategically, because 'takes election integrity seriously Y/N' is existential.
I do not buy that someone actually has deep political convictions when those convictions are never even slightly in conflict with just leaning into whatever is making their anus spasm from moment to moment
People who believe stuff often face conflicts between their beliefs and impulses!
This goes for any and all posters on this website who buy into some version of 'posting is totally meaningless, until I want to claim it as Important, except when I'm criticized, which magically makes it meaningless again'
This is _why_ posting is meaningless, especially what you think is valorous.
Right, you were being called doomers not because they'd try to fuck around but because of how unlikely it is to succeed given the lack of clear mechanisms to do so. Which isn't the same as no threat! But yeah like Christ people, you need a bit of steel to get through the next few years
In Wyoming? Probably not. But if anything here turns on how Wyoming votes, it's gonna be because that's where the remainder of surviving Americans live
Comments
People who believe stuff often face conflicts between their beliefs and impulses!
This is _why_ posting is meaningless, especially what you think is valorous.