You see it in the absolute and decontextualised arguments, devoid of historical flow or nuance or, which is worst, an openness that invites listening, and coda to understand them critically, possibly refute them.
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
This approach to dialogue assumes bad faith, chains conclusions to the power and energy of absolute, irrefutable moral imperatives, dichotomies & Kafka traps. And dichotomies usually cover the blind spot of self-exceptionalism.
This is not dialogue, empathy, expressions of identity or ideology. We’re screaming statements and thinking by proxy of topical, powerful issues and competing for attention, power.
Comments