Just published a paper in Nature Scientific Reports where we've trained a model to automatically detect logical fallacies in climate misinformation - part of our project using AI to debunk climate myths https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-76139-w
Comments
Sorry for the confusion.
yes, the climate choir needs to sing better, and having PROOF at hand, that can be pointed to online, is a big step forward.
I presume you train the models very well on real climate data, on typical climate misinfo - what else?
Human logic needs an explicit go
Coup?