Remember when Zuckerberg spent $40 billion a year for 5 years on virtual reality and changed the name of his company to justify the expenses? AI can't replace that.
They also don't understand the very basics of the economy. Because if he's right then he's wrong.
If nobody has a job who is paying the businesses that he's invested in?
He's arguing for the destruction of capitalism, which okay based, but then what?
The elephant in the room is that other than boilerplate letter writing, the things LLM would be best at are the functions of executives and VCs minus their ego/biases.
No, no, he’s right. Without the VCs, who will keep telling us that the find/replace engine is actually an ai god?
Who will tell you that the ditch the ai never dug was actually dug by the ai? Who will lobby government to fund more find/replace engine data centers? Who will take all the money?
I know he seems like a clown, but this guy is rapidly beating out Musk/Thiel/Prince in terms of evil, considering the shit he's been saying in the group chats and elsewhere where he thinks no one is taking notes
Also just how little respect he has for the vast majority of job functions (& the vast majority of humans). “There’s an intangibility to it” oh shit you don’t say, can’t think of any other jobs like that
I mean seriously, I can say that about any job. And as someone that uses AI on a regular basis, I can also tel you that doing something like coding to do your work is right now about a 2/10. And you have to understand how to make it get you to 7/10 and beyond - and guess what "it's intangible"
its a very funny inversion of what i have been saying for years that the AI bros think AI can replace every job on earth bc their jobs are the first ones that are gonna be replaced.
But I do think an AI is specifically better able to manage 200 group chats than that Egg guy.
It's also an extreme example of the Dunning-Kruger effect: Only the one job that he understands is complex. Every other job in the world is simple enough to be replaced by AI.
it's almost like vc bullshit is the only job he's done, so he understands the nuances of it in a way he doesn't with other jobs, which he assumes are simple enough to be done by chatgpt
Comments
highly specialized area skills, particularly those with a significant physical component, are the least amenable for AI to improve human productivity
but PE, VC, management consulting, that's kinda right in its sweet spot
If nobody has a job who is paying the businesses that he's invested in?
He's arguing for the destruction of capitalism, which okay based, but then what?
Working in CS, and using AI on a regular basis statements like this show just how little these guys really do know.
B. Their assumption of what AI CAN do is just way WAY off. It has a long way to go to replace human.
I think they figure replace all the workers as cheap labor is always their goal. But they really don't get just how far that really is.
Who will tell you that the ditch the ai never dug was actually dug by the ai? Who will lobby government to fund more find/replace engine data centers? Who will take all the money?
Also, "more an art than a science" is a fun way to say "statistically performs no better than random chance"
But I do think an AI is specifically better able to manage 200 group chats than that Egg guy.