ThreadSky
About ThreadSky
Log In
arstechnica.com
•
2 days ago
Comments
Log in
with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
[–]
jadeskye.bsky.social
•
2 days ago
That is so shit. My Synology rack has been fantastic with WD drives. If they do this I cannot justify another synology device
0
reply
[–]
clamheaven.bsky.social
•
2 days ago
Nope
9
reply
[–]
genserver.be
•
22 hours ago
It's already the case for nvme drives. You cannot create volumes with non-syno drives. You can only create caches. Assholes.
0
reply
[–]
pedant.blue
•
2 days ago
Going the way of printer ink, eh
0
reply
[–]
braintelligence.bsky.social
•
2 days ago
Maybe I’m getting old but this seems reasonable and limiting it to their top tier is a good compromise
I’ve worked with the public enough to know people will find every edge case and loophole in a product
Reducing these unknowns creates a better software and support experience
0
reply
[–]
gimmecat666.bsky.social
•
2 days ago
Guess I’ll find another NAS vendor when my 920 dies
3
reply
[–]
artofficial.bsky.social
•
2 days ago
I really like my Synology, so I'm going to wait for the specifics of this program. But if this is true enshittification, I will yeet Synology from my home stack so fuckin fast.
2
reply
[–]
heptaglemious.bsky.social
•
2 days ago
Another brand I have to stop buying. Le sigh.
3
reply
Posting Rules
Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service
×
Reply
Post Reply
Comments
I’ve worked with the public enough to know people will find every edge case and loophole in a product
Reducing these unknowns creates a better software and support experience