It's a thought; but 2025 was written for Trump and we have no idea who the Democratic Party nominee is going to be. So unless there is barometer on how far left a policy is I don't think it'll work.
I see what you mean, and I even laughed a little at the thought you put behind "adjust", "filter", "give" because I get it.
I just think that where Project 2025 served as cannon fodder for the Dems to attack Republicans; a Project 2029 would likely just do the same for Dems attacking Dems.
Maybe if all the left leaning groups for a specific issue got together and wrote the policy playbook that would be better. But then I think they'll have to put aside differences and compromise somewhere in the middle instead of holding out hope that they could get more with their fav candidate pick.
Is part of the appeal of P25 that it is cohesively extreme but cohesively a vision? Doesn’t seem like there was much compromise in the plan and they’ll compromise in back room deals. We need a clear vision putting people unapologetically first in all areas and issues and take it from there.
I think the appeal for P25 is that was a bunch of conversative policies written by people who thought they could get Trump to back it. I don't think they had moderates or liberals to negotiate with in the backrooms.
I applaud your energy but shit is about to get existential for a lot of folks We need to survive this year then take back a federalChamber and take back state houses in 26. Then we can focus on 29. Our polices are great our ability to get and retain power through effective messaging is the issue.
Comments
I just think that where Project 2025 served as cannon fodder for the Dems to attack Republicans; a Project 2029 would likely just do the same for Dems attacking Dems.