My favorite part of these submissions (and thank you for showing them to us) is the frequent use of "non-reviewable". It's almost as though the DOJ attorneys are desperate to find something that POTUS could have done here that the judge won't touch.
Ah, but don't neglect the totally clinching FRCP 65(d)(1)(A) argument that they're so in love with. It seems to get about three pages in this fifteen-page brief. Also a very strong start out of the gate again insulting the judge. Their client, if not the judge, will love that.
The key legal mistake is that the judge ordered them not to be removed from their jurisdiction, not from the United States proper. But what even is law to a convict president
Am I really missing something? The persons removed from the US to El Salvador are still in US custody. We are paying El Salvador to house them. They have not been charged or convicted of any crimes in El Salvador.
Comments
Powered by @skywriter.blue