What is the point of via saying they are certain about something with low confidence ie not certain! Majority of scientists say evidence supports that covid was natural not lab leak and all this so-called report does is muddy the water🧪
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
My personal observation: Plenty of research shows that smaller organisms adapt and evolve faster for plenty of reasons, and environmental changes are a catalyst of evolution. I haven't seen a study, but I think climate change is part of the equation.
Guess we'll get a lot more of this BS with Trump and his gang running things. So much research supports that it was not a lab leak. But they love promoting a good conspiracy theory to rile up the masses. 😵💫
As in every intelligence organisation, they create report based on hypothesis, and they work with whatever fact, witness they can find.
None of them have compelling proof.
The rest is politics.
The scientist team sent there, could not access any reports from the lab. They were all very suspicious.
I think there is no “majority” consensus. It was more like “WHO-consensus” driven by politics. The whole MAGA anti-WHO, anti-vaxx and anti-science shitstorm originates in the unscrupulous and ideological behaviour of a small group of scientists.
"Low confidence generally means questionable or implausible information was used, the information is too fragmented or poorly corroborated to make solid analytic inferences, or significant concerns or problems with sources existed."
What evidence? Unless the Chinese release it, we will never know. Some biosecurity experts think both are possible, but the lab leak is probably more likely. Scientists often refuse to believe in human cause for biosecurity issues historically.
Comments
https://youtu.be/wtwQlfiDSOo?feature=shared&t=620
None of them have compelling proof.
The rest is politics.
The scientist team sent there, could not access any reports from the lab. They were all very suspicious.
In other words, just another day in MAGA land.