ThreadSky
About ThreadSky
Log In
carlquintanilla.bsky.social
•
16 days ago
B of A: “.. US defense spend >$900bn in ’24 .. tempting source of savings ..” [Hartnett]
Comments
Log in
with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
[–]
thisaintright.bsky.social
•
15 days ago
They only cut programmes that help people, never ones that kill, Silly.
1
reply
[–]
lakerider.bsky.social
•
16 days ago
It will take a couple trillion to develop the 141 square miles of Gaza for those Network Citizens.
1
reply
[–]
limelightonyou.bsky.social
•
16 days ago
What do we have from all this Offensive Military Defense Spending?
Oklahoma City Bombing?
New York City Airplane Attacks?
Thousands of Veterans with PTSD and lifelong injuries?
Misery and pain?
3
reply
[–]
shanemcoyle.bsky.social
•
16 days ago
2
reply
[–]
smb6789.bsky.social
•
15 days ago
One would think
1
reply
[–]
lecarre.bsky.social
•
16 days ago
☝️
2
reply
[–]
bsbeamer.bsky.social
•
16 days ago
Yet, the DOGE isn’t looking at this at all. The actual place to reduce spending.
4
1
reply
[–]
vescoisland.bsky.social
•
16 days ago
The Pentagon isn’t letting them in the door for starters
2
reply
[–]
aldenemberlyn.bsky.social
•
16 days ago
We're already falling behind in weapons technology. The J-36 and J-50 are superior to anything we've ever put in the sky.
That said... I completely agree with the BofA. NGADF is FUBAR.
1
reply
Posting Rules
Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service
×
Reply
Post Reply
Comments
Oklahoma City Bombing?
New York City Airplane Attacks?
Thousands of Veterans with PTSD and lifelong injuries?
Misery and pain?
That said... I completely agree with the BofA. NGADF is FUBAR.