1. Before the election, the WSJ was basically Fox News in print. Why the whiplash? Was it just about kissing ass and goosing readership?
2. How could any banker believe Trump would lead to anything but disaster? Economies need stability. Trump is a water balloon filled with TNT-laced diarrhea.
Good. His voters can live with crushing prices and no opportunity to achieve their dreams. Meanwhile, middle-income consumers in Emerging Asia will be 20x of the U.S. population by the end of the decade.
I hope they're all experiencing a wicked hangover from the stupid euphoria they felt on Jan. 20th. I want 'em all to have such pain--operatic in scope--that it chases them into their very dreams; contorting them into nightmares. Why? So that America NEVER, ever, does something this stupid again.
Carl, it may seem a little unsteady to them now, but they are counting on Trump extending their sweet tax cuts so they can still stiff their house staff on raises and bonuses.
Isn’t legacy (boomer & genxs) media so ironic? The whole business model is shouting “fart” in a crowded room. It finds modern flaws that it specifically creates by having news to sell in the recent past. And oldheads complain about “kids” not reading “real” news like newspapers. Old stuff sucks!
Comments
2. How could any banker believe Trump would lead to anything but disaster? Economies need stability. Trump is a water balloon filled with TNT-laced diarrhea.
Too late.
They helped create this.
Eff them!
RumpStagFlation is:
Stagnation of economic activity (i.e. job loses and high unemployment) induced by rump tariffs that causes inflation (i.e. higher prices).
Is a worse economic scenario possible?
What do you think?
It’s too bad the ignorant masses that voted for him don’t read the WSJ.
Like HRC, she was right about everything
I mean, remember when DT said he knew nothing about Project 2025, then on Day 1 started implementing it, and nominated its authors?