Freedom of reach is the real battle in social media right now. Algorithmic feeds vs. deterministic timelines isn't just UX - it's about whether platforms or users control what gets seen. And these choices fundamentally reshape online communities. 1/6 - ThreadSky

moskov.goodventures.org • 34 days ago

Freedom of reach is the real battle in social media right now. Algorithmic feeds vs. deterministic timelines isn't just UX - it's about whether platforms or users control what gets seen. And these choices fundamentally reshape online communities. 1/6

Reposted from Dustin Moskovitz

Threads vs. Bluesky. Spot the difference.

Comments

mjordan102.bsky.social•34 days ago

Yes. All dems and gop should wear blue and gold on 3/4/25. Watch the meltdown.

kevontheweb.net•33 days ago

IMO, I don't think algorithms should be responsible for reach. It introduces a middle man who will always have some bias. People are too used to algorithms feeding them. Now it feels difficult to just follow people you like & see the posts chronologically (which has the most organic reach IMO).

moskov.goodventures.org•34 days ago

Algorithmic feeds don't deliberately boost specific viewpoints (so I'm *not* accusing Threads of favoring Russia), but they make sweeping categorical decisions. When Threads dampens "politics," entire discourse landscapes shift. Some users leave, others arrive, and the network's DNA changes. 2/6

cjtheotakuishere.bsky.social•34 days ago

I honestly do believe that many social media companies are favouring the Putin/Trump regime. But i otherwise agree with what your saying. There should be legislation that prevents social media from using algorithms this way and operate more like bluesky imo.

desertscott.bsky.social•34 days ago

Absolutely twitter is favoring Trump. They have the same owner.

moskov.goodventures.org•34 days ago

I'm not calling this censorship - it's a freedom of *reach* issue. When platforms decide what content deserves distribution, they're not blocking speech, but they're absolutely determining who gets heard and when. The consequences are just as real. 3/6

moskov.goodventures.org•34 days ago

Bluesky and Reddit take the opposite approach: user-controlled feeds put curation power where it belongs. YOU choose what appears through follows, custom feeds, and communities - not an algorithm deciding what you "should" see based on engagement metrics. 4/6

moskov.goodventures.org•34 days ago

The genius of user-controlled feeds: diverse preferences can coexist without compromise. No need for one-size-fits-all algorithmic judgments when people can build information environments tailored to their specific interests and tolerance levels. This serves their users and societal goals too. 5/6

moskov.goodventures.org•34 days ago

From my POV, this explains the platform migrations we're seeing. People don't just want civility - they want control over their information diet. The power to choose is ultimately more valuable than algorithmic convenience, and platforms ignoring this are losing their most engaged users. 6/6

glassbydeanna.bsky.social•34 days ago

That is why I am here. Zuckerberg has too much control of our communication. Messages,Instagram, Whatsapp, FB and Threads. He was seated in FRONT of congress at the inauguration. No thanks This and Spoutible for me unless the 1% get control there then I will just use this thing as a phone

rpgirl.bsky.social•34 days ago

Agreed - BSky works for me because it intentionally appealed to engaged geeks and posters - you look who got invited right away, its the ones who really 'got' Twitter early on.

I never touched Threads because I didnt want someone else deciding what I see. I wanted to choose for myself.

afib.bsky.social•34 days ago

I'm frustrated by having to choose between the great atmosphere, sense of community, and level of engagement I experience on Threads, and the knowledge (which I have on Bluesky) that this is an ultimately user-owned and -controlled platform.

h1llbilies.bsky.social•34 days ago

Always good to remember this advice.. https://www.threads.net/@hillbillies_glos/post/DCwPy14oQ1a?xmt=AQGzIGzZ1LxsCZXYiCgqUR95T7wTVCR9RoU-RFU9HBRxSQ

reparsons.bsky.social•34 days ago

I know you won't accuse Threads of favoring Russia, but I will accuse Meta/FB leadership of supporting authoritarianism *cough* Zuckerberg.

martinbjensen.bsky.social•34 days ago

This is true for me, but it seems like this is a (mildly) demanding choice that not everyone takes. Similar to books vs netflix, or nuance vs party line. Do you have thoughts on how to make the nonalgorithmic experience more immediately rewarding?

dents6679.bsky.social•34 days ago

@techconnectify.bsky.social recently made a fantastic video on the same issue.

https://youtu.be/QEJpZjg8GuA

thatsjustlikeyouropinionman.com•34 days ago

big fan of https://graze.social for an early toolset for this. It’s not really “everyman” easy yet, but since the feed recipe is basically just a json manifest, one can imagine sculpting feeds with the help of an LLM that tweaks the manifest with direct user feedback.

pfung.dev•32 days ago

but the problem with user-controlled feeds is they don't surface content i want fast enough. Its tedious to navigate the huge BSky feed after living with algo-feeds for so long. I want to the algo to surface content that i like so i don't sift through it.

stacy1955.bsky.social•34 days ago

The civility on this platform is so much better than on X. There are barely any nazi scumbags on this platform, and most people are highly intelligent and intellecutal on this platform.

deltamuff77.bsky.social•34 days ago

What do you make of the online troll farm activity in the (most often) conservative-leaning subs? There seems to be a very aggressive misinformation campaign in these subs trying to “train” and redirect the conversation.

moskov.goodventures.org•34 days ago

Don’t think I’m in those subs

deltamuff77.bsky.social•34 days ago

I see it all over r/Conservative. And many people in other subs cannot seem to be able to identify who they are responding to.

Many of the comments are left by ai/bots or stray maggots.

Negative karma accounts shouldn’t be getting any engagement at all and blocked immediately.

tartanskull.bsky.social•34 days ago

ogredragon.bsky.social•34 days ago

AI decides who gets to see what view of information.. they pick their targets

thatsjustlikeyouropinionman.com•34 days ago

Elon definitely boosts specific POVs on X, especially his own.

jessethegray.bsky.social•34 days ago

Since they are private companies, how to we know there isn't algorithmic tweeking we are not aware of? Given Elon's actual suppression and boosting and Zucks open support, I find this to be an pretty big assumption atm

2nddoorontheright.bsky.social•34 days ago

I wish social media companies would honestly try to get rid of bots which they definitely can do. The only reason these companies don't work to get rid of them is because they drive up artificial user numbers.

ruthkub.bsky.social•34 days ago

If I remember right I saw some reporting a while back that about half of FaceBook's user numbers are actually bots. They don't get rid of them because the numerical reduction would be embarrassing.

karina916.bsky.social•33 days ago

Wow.

ogredragon.bsky.social•34 days ago

They aren't only curating the information your receive.. they are CURATING YOU... My analysis: Free to read, no subscription needed https://substack.com/home/post/p-157788500

jpmuc73.bsky.social•34 days ago

I really don’t get why there is no mass exodus from Meta and X.

thefirstcrystal.bsky.social•34 days ago

I lost a friend for about 35 years. She lives in S. America. I used to say I kept FB because I didn't want to lose her again. We use a different platform to communicate and I'm not worried about losing her again. I'm getting close to leave. I hope Blue Sky works out.

jenifair.bsky.social•34 days ago

I’m in groups on FB that publicize information faster and all in one place that I use for my job. I market my business on FB and IG. I don’t think there is a viable alternative yet, but when there is I’ll move.
1 thing I’ll really miss is the memories that pop up. I love being reminded of 1/2

jenifair.bsky.social•34 days ago

of something my kid said that I posted or an outing with friends. It enrages me that it could have just been an amazing way to connect with people but greed won.

tartanskull.bsky.social•34 days ago

Offer to help boomers save their fb data, set up an inactive account with one public post with alternative contact info & help them with sign-ups & learning new platforms & finding community.

We need to help make change easier for people.

neonymousbosh.bsky.social•34 days ago

I got rid of Facebook and Twitter the day after the election and I know lots of people who have left Twitter – – I just don’t think anybody is reporting on it.

lauram1708.bsky.social•34 days ago

I don't care for censorship no matter how it's dressed so I've reduced my use of FB. I'll kept it to stay in touch w/family, some find tech confusing and others sadly are sheeple.

caroodles.bsky.social•34 days ago

I do not post on FB anymore. My account is still because I also have some relatives that I’d lose touch if it weren’t for them.

itsperspextive.bsky.social•34 days ago

Money. At least on X you can manipulate your way to a payout for posting trash. Thats why their numbers are so high over there.

I also think platforms leaning hard politically one way or the other cause people to not move easily too.

cyberpunksquid.bsky.social•34 days ago

Change is hard. I know people who hate what Meta has become with a burning passion, yet their fear of change is greater than that hatred. Even greater than the fear for their own existence.

Then there's the Sunk Cost fallacy. They'd rather stay somewhere horrible than cut their losses and move.

adamfrommelbourne.bsky.social•34 days ago

Probably also an element of FOMO, platforms have been shown to be addictive.

I turned off Facebook for 5 years after one morning realising I had spent 2 hours of my time scanning the feed. Such a time waster 😆

cyberpunksquid.bsky.social•34 days ago

... who are incapable of altering their views in the face of new information. Too many people are overloaded with the information they want to accept any information that is true, and we all suffer as a result of them succumbing to the desire for validation that overrides critical thinking.

adamfrommelbourne.bsky.social•33 days ago

So true! We are in a society with information overload. Critical thinking should be a core subject in all schools from primary school through to university.

cyberpunksquid.bsky.social•34 days ago

We live in an age driven by computers, yet many do not get why computer experts are called "IT"; Information Technology. Computers are not about code or apps, but about handling *INFORMATION*. And handling information seems to be a lost art, as evidenced by the number of people... /3

cyberpunksquid.bsky.social•34 days ago

There was a point where only a small minority could not keep up, but we've passed that point. And it's accelerated since schools stopped teaching the fundamental principles of many of those advances, leaving many with no understanding of how information works beyond "There's an app for that!" /2

cyberpunksquid.bsky.social•34 days ago

FOMO is inevitable as we approach the point where technology advances faster than humanity can keep up with. And I've seen more and more people fall behind over the last few decades as that point has shifted to a lower percentile of humanity. /1

holdinghope22.bsky.social•34 days ago

Sometimes it’s about the community you’ve built perhaps

quiltlovinlisa.bsky.social•34 days ago

It's hard to leave but sometimes you have to decide what's more important, and I decided that my personal values are more important than the communities that I had on Twitter and Facebook.

holdinghope22.bsky.social•34 days ago

Twitter yes. I agree. Fb I use for my local community and my business.

quiltlovinlisa.bsky.social•34 days ago

My husband keeps facebook for facebook market place.

lpskeen.bsky.social•34 days ago

There's also the fact that there's no similar alternative. If I don't like a Ford, I can go buy a Subaru, and get basically the same thing. If I don't like Facebook, where am I gonna go? None of the other platforms that have heard of have groups like FB does, which is the one thing I miss /1

lpskeen.bsky.social•34 days ago

about Facebook, I'm unaware of other SM that has a feature similar to Marketplace, and I'm unaware of any SM that offers chat the way Threads does. Each platform has a different personality and features. You're going to argue that BS has chat, which we are doing now, and that's true, but /2

lpskeen.bsky.social•34 days ago

It's not the same feel as Threads. BS is more formal and cerebral feeling, where Threads is more casual. That's not wrong; it just IS.

moskov.goodventures.org•34 days ago

Threads doesn’t have chat though?

lara3000.bsky.social•34 days ago

I’d resisted leaving meta. Always an excuse. I closed my 3 IG accounts in early Feb, surprised that 3 weeks later, don't miss it.

Have deleted all but 10 people from my FB acct & all old posts, but still holding on as I sort my immigration in UK as there is an excellent group resource.

ruthkub.bsky.social•34 days ago

@hankgreen.bsky.social said on a recent video that he gets asked why he's still there, he responds he's trying to be a positive influence. I've seen others say they only stay because there are still people there that they want to connect with. It's better off left to the Nazis and foreign bots.

robertakelley.bsky.social•34 days ago

There's also the issue that some have created their own little community on Threads that's difficult to move over to here. I have people on Threads I talk with on a daily basis via comments and posts and we love it. It brings us some happiness and fun. The switch is more difficult than you'd think.

jillreed.bsky.social•34 days ago

Also mass employee walkouts at all broligarch companies. They are working for the very people actively stripping their rights away. It’s truly insane.

therealmistere.bsky.social•33 days ago

Do you think algorithmic content distribution/amplification is consistent with Section 230 exemptions? To me it seems obvious that algos are not quite editorial decisions, but they’re also a far cry from the “dumb pipes” they had in mind when writing Section 230.

weedeevb.bsky.social•34 days ago

I think FOX should be taken to court again for its lies and made to change its name removing News because it’s an opinion show. I went on X and it’s a cesspool of lies and disinformation. I have no doubt that truth social is the same. Congress on their telling clear blatant lies!

holdinghope22.bsky.social•34 days ago

I’ve said exact same!

ruthkub.bsky.social•34 days ago

IMO the decision in the defamation suit should have included a requirement to run a chiron across all of their programming, "MAY NOT BE ACCURATE. DO YOUR OWN FACT CHECKING. FOR ENTERTAINMENT ONLY".

marylou.bsky.social•34 days ago

Why not both? As a consumer not a producer, that's how I use the platforms. Follow and read both. I suspect I'm not the only one.

itsperspextive.bsky.social•34 days ago

I do the same. I use almost all the platforms out there and read as much as I can to draw my own conclusions.

queerintech.com•34 days ago

Truly its the crux of the problem.

queerintech.com•34 days ago

In the not too distant past, print media hired writers, sent them off to their beats and at end of day decided what was news worthy for publishing. They knew their job was to provide the most important and most truthful news they could.

queerintech.com•34 days ago

Today social media platforms aggregate and publish stories from everywhere, and publish every second. There is no human at the wheel though.. Algorithms make decisions on importance and truth.

queerintech.com•34 days ago

Importance is decided by
1) how many users post/like/comment
2) is it being promoted financially
3) the platforms values

queerintech.com•34 days ago

Truth is decided by similar factors
1) likes/comments
2) financial promotion
3) platforms values
4) and finally, the news sources trustworthiness ( maybe? )

markvonwisco.bsky.social•34 days ago

I was active at the other place over the past 2 years. I don't claim to be a person with amazing insights or takes, & didn't post exclusively about politics. I doubt that I ever broke over a 100 real followers. I've only been super active here since the election & have seen far more engagement.

surfacemaximus.bsky.social•34 days ago

I’m having a similar experience, and prefer it greatly

markvonwisco.bsky.social•33 days ago

Good to hear that it's not just me.

megardener.bsky.social•34 days ago

Engagement is what social media should be about

vannevar.bsky.social•34 days ago

Yes, this is why the cries of “free speech” by social media moguls ring so hollow. It doesn’t matter what you’re free to say on social media, it only matters WHO CONTROLS WHO SEES IT.

bslkuye1.bsky.social•34 days ago

👀👀👀

thefoundfashion.bsky.social•33 days ago

Agree! F🖕ck meta

millennialmomreads.bsky.social•34 days ago

Today I got a warning notice on insta for commenting that Mark Zuckerberg is a human trash bag 😆without even tagging him in it. I deleted and said “it’s giving oligarch” though so apparently that commentary is too high brow for Meta to try to censor it yet 😆

iznetro.bsky.social•34 days ago

Which is why i'm migrating away fro both Insta & Threads. I kinda miss the endless feed of crap I&T gave me but I'm also glad that I can have enough of my bluesky feed & when I see the same post again, it' a sign I've had my fill and to do something else for a while. That's a good thing for ME, IMHO

406inthelou.bsky.social•34 days ago

📌

nv-heart.bsky.social•34 days ago

I left all the Meta apps on 1/20.
Now it's Bluesky, Substack and few YouTube subscription (of former TicTok-ers)
#FuckZuck

usajob2025.bsky.social•34 days ago

If you want to know more about this topic, read this post by click below the link
https://zt.ms/FRND

aviewoflife.bsky.social•33 days ago

We will prevail! It is not a choice.

natiarmati.bsky.social•34 days ago

Those algorithms should be illegal

robobearart.bsky.social•34 days ago

Especially waltzes and country swing

desertscott.bsky.social•34 days ago

Thank you Dustin for the info.

For everyone - please stop the excuses and leave those sites TODAY. The longer you and your friends engage there, the harder it will be to fix this country. Do you want easy or democracy?

caroodles.bsky.social•34 days ago

Leaving twitter is number one! No one should feed the social media of the man actively destroying our country.

ronnysmeink.bsky.social•34 days ago

Even an echo chamber full of good reasonable people is still an echo chamber…

infinitedetritus.bsky.social•34 days ago

The old “you always see the accusation, never the retraction” is even stronger now. You scroll your timeline, see the accusation, see 200 people blowup about it, and it goes away forever—with you never seeing the retraction

outeastcheech.bsky.social•34 days ago

I'm banned on Twitter until tomorrow.

I'm still getting spambot notifications about liking my post. To document the spambot problem w/ nobody caring from the top, I started adding the bots to the list function. Watch that become disabled soon.

Spambots are users and can view ads according to Elon

giodicani.bsky.social•34 days ago

22r3

djb-aleeya71.bsky.social•32 days ago

♦️Everybody they are pushing for an audit of the paper votes yay! They're asking for your help please listen and share. If you can't listen you can read the pics for what to do. This is the best news!! 💜

https://youtu.be/AWSWqn7UHYM?si=E4H4YN76PAnjqsTA

goodki-d.bsky.social•34 days ago

all said bluesky is still missing the sauce, the algorithm is visibly not engaging

kevontheweb.net•33 days ago

I never bother with What's Hot or any of those feed. I just build my own lists and follow people that post stuff I enjoy. Then I can see it chronologically and when I start seeing stuff I saw yesterday I'm done for the day.

goodki-d.bsky.social•33 days ago

The problem is "you" will not be followed
The organic discovery is quasi zero

Either you have to be discovered from somewhere where you already have a presence maybe
Otherwise good luck

vannevar.bsky.social•34 days ago

If you expect Bluesky to be like Twitter, of course you’re going to be disappointed. The algorithm doesn’t spoon feed you here, you have to actively curate a community of voices you want to interact with. It’s more work. But the alternative is to turn your brain over to someone else to fill.

goodki-d.bsky.social•34 days ago

I'm new here but it's cold
If you are here for sometime you'll know
You are also just talking about getting content part
Not the getting engagement part
Good luck with that

vannevar.bsky.social•34 days ago

People engage as much as they care to. Who are you imagining getting engagement *for*?

goodki-d.bsky.social•34 days ago

There is zero discoverability

vannevar.bsky.social•34 days ago

Not true. I’ve collected lots of interesting accounts to follow. You do have to use search more. The default feed is not intended to be your only option, it’s just that, a default. If you look in niches, it can be a bit bare because it’s still a relatively small active user base.

pldm.bsky.social•34 days ago

engagement might be our current problem. Look at what happened outsourcing the effort to search and seek for dopamine to a algorithm. Just getting the worst out of humanity.

goodki-d.bsky.social•34 days ago

sorry but this won't work in long term
I see a lot of big accs that posted about moving to bsky but haven't posted in 1mo/3mo

holdinghope22.bsky.social•34 days ago

What do you mean?

reallyreally.bsky.social•34 days ago

Fascinating

dawniefish.bsky.social•34 days ago

https://bsky.app/profile/dawniefish.bsky.social/post/3ljehvqmgrk2q

lifeinfuquayvarina.bsky.social•34 days ago

Resisters have left meta

bslkuye1.bsky.social•34 days ago

Yup, fuk zuk

lemonsama.bsky.social•34 days ago

It's actually the platform choosing what their algorithm shows. X can definitely delete or at least shadow most of their extreme right wing posts, they chose to boost them on purpose. An algorithm isn't subject to showing you specific subject matter unless you've specifically chosen them.

lemonsama.bsky.social•34 days ago

You would actually do a poster more harm by blocking them than replying, like it or not. Algorithm wise replying to anything or even looking at replies means to them you're interested.

nellyfriday.bsky.social•34 days ago

The Oligorithm.

surfacemaximus.bsky.social•34 days ago

🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆

neonymousbosh.bsky.social•34 days ago

I’m @neonymousbosh.bsky.social and I approve this message.

flvillager.bsky.social•34 days ago

I can say posting the very same post back to back on three media platforms and finding followers there’s is no comparison to Blue Sky. I get what shadow ban is. Frankly I only use the others to find inspiration for post hear. No comparison. My likes and reshares prove it

sherryd13.bsky.social•34 days ago

What is going on in your country is the same thing that was taking place when Putin was elected in beginning, starting with a one state media. Not allowing for people to speak the truth! Shoveling your toxic sludge down everyones throat as the truth! Now extortion with your allies, keep it up!🤬

markrnay.bsky.social•34 days ago

Threads is just more corporate filtered info. Not trustworthy

ruthkub.bsky.social•34 days ago

@muellershewrote.bsky.social says her podcasts have gained a ton of viewers since she started posting links here instead of Threads and Twitter. Her posts were being hidden on the other sites.

gonnerinsocal.bsky.social•34 days ago

We need to be able to sue social media companies for dangerous or malicious information being promoted by the algorithm. We get to speak, they get to determine what gets heard. That’s not free speech!

caroodles.bsky.social•34 days ago

I don’t know why but Thread’s algorithm for me has been good. Still a lot of good posts from leftists. I don’t don’t engage like in here. But there are more bot accounts.

alimac72.bsky.social•34 days ago

So true be it politics or fashion these algorithms are much like life in that they only favor 1 to 5%

freeamerica.bsky.social•34 days ago

if you are still on shitter you are complicit in all that is going on...the second that nazi bought it you should have bailed...and meta is nazi haven to...fuck your subs and get off there you idiots...

https://youtu.be/QEQOvyGbBtY?si=p6-Jzu9Guxl5n1AI

glue74.bsky.social•34 days ago

I did not

pensierimalig.bsky.social•33 days ago

I think a good thing about Bluesky is the work needed to get the balance of feeds and subjects that you are looking for. It means it is harder for the imbeciles, trolls and fanatics to gey traction. 1/2

pensierimalig.bsky.social•33 days ago

But on the other hand the worst thing about Bluesky is the work needed to get the balance of feeds and subjects that you are looking for. I am oldish and technology is a challenge. 😁 And I was never on the Twitty thingy!

frankenmizer.bsky.social•34 days ago

Spot-on, Dustin. Thank you. 🙇

skitwytch.bsky.social•33 days ago

New vs Old Google.

Is what I'm seeing.

fill-freakin.bsky.social•34 days ago

The problem is that hate garners views and creates "engagement". It's not healthy, but it seems to be part of human nature. We all love to watch a good fight, right? Social media algorithms, unfettered, will amplify this.
I've noticed a marked difference in Insta lately.

saneplanet.bsky.social•34 days ago

@muellershewrote.bsky.social
You may appreciate this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NJAj4hsJQs

socalsilencer.bsky.social•34 days ago

Here’s a good one: my post to Reddit on the same issue (where Reddit moderators disclosed this particular section was the correct one to post in) DELETED my post claiming another section was the right one. I’m simply not in the mood to argue with these automated eejits…
—a voice never listened to

socalsilencer.bsky.social•34 days ago

🎯 As I was attempting 2 use an emoji yesterday, a bicycle appeared in the list. I did not put it there, nor used it previously. It was pushed through simply because I apparently upset a group of lobbyist which led to my X suspension! Refusing 2 delete has locked me out. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

80dollarguitar.bsky.social•34 days ago

We can use another freedom...the freedom of choice. Choose not to use toxic social media platforms. Don't stare at your phone for hours on end until you need a sign that says, "Warning, pavement is hot!" when you're outside and it's hot.

greenmamalama.bsky.social•34 days ago

Throttled left

alxindia.bsky.social•34 days ago

Exactly. Ugh.
(following you, now)

counselore.bsky.social•34 days ago

It would be nice if posts were graded based on factual accuracy.

davidcdean.com•34 days ago

I imagine you see the trouble with that too, though.

Seems like we’re always arguing over a kind of tyranny of the majority, or delegating extreme authority to a single entity. I hope I’m wrong, but I kinda think there’s no good answer to this stuff.

ruthkub.bsky.social•34 days ago

Absolutely. That might be a good use of AI if it could be trained properly. Questionable posts could be flagged and passed on to human fact-checkers. Problematic posts could have a fact check added or if necessary be deleted.

bslkuye1.bsky.social•34 days ago

Wow, no engagement on littlex

x3em.bsky.social•33 days ago

LikedIn needs to be sued for denying Free Speech!!!! Call the lawyers!

1202028.bsky.social•34 days ago

This looks like what's called Harvesting. happens alot to influencers who are covert like what if Russel Brand was just a tool of the russians and the cancel was a way to funnel most his viewers to heavy right wing at the right moment. hmmm. record companies do it too. selling views. Feel safe here

holdinghope22.bsky.social•34 days ago

Agree feel safe here. Don’t feel safe at the fka bird. Nor threads. Was way too pushy into other stuff to get looked at..

hotmom21.bsky.social•34 days ago

Imagine

gentrepose.bsky.social•33 days ago

BOT much? Got BOT? AI for K-12 BULLIES never made Capone's job easier.

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply