088sc.bsky.social
2,289 posts
63 followers
81 following
Discussion Master
comment in response to
post
What else do you call authoritarian leaders who oppress their own citizens and believe in violence as a primary method to influence others for their own gain?
That's Hamas.
comment in response to
post
Got it. Only associate people with the movement when it's convenient for the cause.
Well that's not right - you guys associate Hamas with the cause and they're the worst thing that's happened to the Palestinians for a decade.
comment in response to
post
I highly doubt 90% of the cosplayers on college campuses have a single Palestinian friend.
comment in response to
post
Yes, don't believe people when they say that they're propalestinian. The two idiots who set themselves on fire were just attention seekers.
Then again, it's not a surprise that a movement that is focused on keeping fascists in power in Gaza attracted the mentally ill.
comment in response to
post
Even though I raised the question, I am actually shocked.
www.pennlive.com/crime/2025/0...
comment in response to
post
Even though I raised the question, I am actually shocked.
www.pennlive.com/crime/2025/0...
comment in response to
post
permission to do what he did - I'm mad at a Jew, and it's ok to set stuff on fire and be aggressive to get back at them.
comment in response to
post
direct motive related to the conflict, but he appears to be left leaning more than right, which makes him more likely to find solidarity with the movement.
It's entirely possible that thru the lens of his mental illness he viewed the isolated actions of extremists in the movement as
comment in response to
post
I think the movement's association with vandalism, destruction of property and people by fire, and public harassment of pro-Israel figures and limited cases of Jewish people harassment make it a valid question.
I think the fact he's off his rocker and other information we have discounts a
comment in response to
post
More examples, less flatulence
comment in response to
post
You're going to have to demonstrate where I said Israel is committing genocide
comment in response to
post
Your ignorance would fall into none of that spectrum you've just mentioned.
It's funny though that you've gone so far off the deep end that insurance against persecution and genocide is hard right.
comment in response to
post
Sure it does. It doesn't negate the fact that you're talking out of your ass and continue to demonstrate a complete lack of comprehension about multiple things happening in this conflict.
comment in response to
post
Ignorance knows no political spectrum.
And based on your level of ignorance, we don't want to claim you.
comment in response to
post
More examples, less flatulence.
comment in response to
post
So no, that article doesn't say it.
Thanks for demonstrating to the internet the frequency in which you talk out of your anus.
comment in response to
post
I know it's been like 40 nonsensical comments from you since I asked this originally, but you're going to have to point out where I've defended Israel's actions.
comment in response to
post
I was going to ask how being confronted with the fact that you don't know what you're talking about hurts me, but then I remembered - you don't know what the fuck you're talking about so it would be a waste of time.
comment in response to
post
I was going to say go ahead and point out where that article says that Israel is purposely targeting reporters, but then I remembered - you don't know what the fuck you're talking about and it would be a waste of time.
comment in response to
post
Says the person who can't define genocide, apartheid, and lawful resistance. All while championing ethnic cleansing and genocide being attempted by Hamas.
I think we're done here, sometimes I forget that I can't fix the intellectually challenged over the internet.
comment in response to
post
Stop using words whose definitions you can't successfully apply to current events. I don't know how it's possible, but it somehow makes you look even worse.
comment in response to
post
So, not only do you champion the ethnic cleansing and genocide of Israelis, you also are now calling for more reporters to get caught in the crossfire and military operations.
comment in response to
post
There you go once again demonstrating that you don't understand the concepts of genocide and ethnic cleansing.
Until you do, you might want to stop making yourself look uneducated. You're certainly adding zero value to your movement.
comment in response to
post
Lol Wikipedia
comment in response to
post
There you go using words that you don't understand again.
For argument's sake - There wouldn't be apartheid if they weren't security threats.
Israel wouldn't be able to get away with things if there was no extremism to combat.
Long-term, the Palestinians are the ones that need to change.
comment in response to
post
You mean those same voters didn't turn out and elected Trump twice?
Smart. Fracture the party even more instead of preaching civics to the virtue signalers.
comment in response to
post
Where has Israel "denied access" to the courts? They have complied with ICJ reporting requirements, and there's obviously enough access for the ICC to level warrants.
It's like not thinking before you speak is an endurance sport for you.
comment in response to
post
I wouldn't be under occupation by a foreign country. I would have stopped being a security threat long ago by keeping my hands to myself.
Also, considering you don't understand what lawful resistance is, you should probably not try to make a point about it.
comment in response to
post
Dude. You cannot successfully apply the definition of genocide and apartheid to current events, while endorsing the attempted ethnic cleansing and genocide of Israel. You are more clueless about lawful resistance than Hamas.
But sure, you're winning here.
comment in response to
post
Where has it been proven false about Hamas using hospitals and medical facilities/vehicles?
comment in response to
post
Not endorse genocide.
comment in response to
post
If it has to be investigated that turns the argument that everyone says there is one on its head.
Again: there is no genocide charge. Not even INCITEMENT. They charged over humanitarian aid... which will be interesting to prove.
comment in response to
post
We get it, you endorse the ethnic cleansing of Israel and genocide of its citizens.
comment in response to
post
Also, yes, the babies thing turned out to not be true and was spread initially by a single reporter. It's a shame Hamas are such savages that people believed it on face value, huh?
comment in response to
post
October 7th wasn't lawful resistance. The ICC and ICJ both have already made that clear.
The UN also disagrees with your take on sexual assault occurring during the attack.
comment in response to
post
And yet they STILL 100% disagree with your previous comment.
And yet the ICC isn't charging GENOCIDE - a chargeable crime.
Sit down and stop babbling.
comment in response to
post
Oh, thanks for demonstrating that hamas isn't engaged in lawful resistance.
comment in response to
post
Darling, resistance is covered under international law. It has a definition.
Otherwise it's just terrorism.
comment in response to
post
Where have I denied crimes of Israel?
Let's add lawful resistance to your ignorance iceberg
Genocide is NOT lawful resistance. Committing war crimes is NOT lawful resistance. Attempting to conquer another country is not lawful resistance.
comment in response to
post
No, I can 100% guarantee the UN and most major human rights organizations do NOT agree with your statement. International law also doesn't agree with your statement.
You clearly do not understand the definition of genocide. Or apartheid.
I'm guessing that's just the tip of the ignorance iceberg.
comment in response to
post
Yes, there's no reason for there to be extremism for 75 years. Learn to live in peace and self-determination.
I'll take your non-answer as you're ok with Hamas trying to commit genocide.
Shocker.
comment in response to
post
Thank you for demonstrating you don't understand the criteria for genocide.
Try quitting while you're behind.
Or let me know when you get a clue.
comment in response to
post
None of the above.
Why do you give Hamas a pass for actively trying to commit genocide?
comment in response to
post
You're the one giving Hamas a pass for actively trying to commit genocide.
comment in response to
post
So... Hamas.
Finally.
comment in response to
post
Who's defending human rights violations?
Well, besides you, I mean.
comment in response to
post
Where have i apologized for Israel?
I do understand what genocide is, that's what makes conversations with you so frustrating. You think you understand, but really don't.
Or you do, and refuse to apply the definition to Hamas. Whose intent is in writing.
comment in response to
post
So... the Palestinians are keeping the Palestinians down then...
comment in response to
post
You're still using words and concepts you don't understand.
comment in response to
post
So then there's NOT token Palestinians in Israel? Dude, pick a lane and stay there.