adamscochran.bsky.social
Partner@CEHV, Adj. Prof Info Sci, Nerd, Dad, thread writer.
54 posts
749 followers
3 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Many legal challenges.
An EO can’t abolish an agency.
The problem is Trump is flooding the field.
By my count we’ve got more new cases to be brought before SCOTUS created this past week, than in the past year combined.
comment in response to
post
Hah fair!
Probably better for mental health.
But I used to make $6k-$8k/month on tweet revenue, then Elon nerfed left leaning or anti-Musk accounts and I get $10/month on the same number of views 😅
comment in response to
post
4 likes - one of my most viral Bluesky posts…
Wtf do we call these anyway? Beets?
comment in response to
post
Ser you’re a YouTuber! You’ve helped to steal it! 😅
comment in response to
post
1449 times assuming you watch 12 hours a day, and sleep the rest of the day because of your life choices 😅
comment in response to
post
Sup
comment in response to
post
1) I’m sure he’d understand waking him up.
2) This is stuff worth being sad about. But, we will fix it in time. Because good people still care
We will resist, we will stand up for those who need us & we will take back this system.
We will do that; because it’s worth doing.
It *will* be ok again.
comment in response to
post
The pipeline of southern Christian evangelical advisors accidentally turning every American man into a woman and being a trans ally by failing biology is kind of hilarious.
Trump is now the first trans president.
comment in response to
post
This one is outlined in United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) btw!
comment in response to
post
3/3
The “subject” part is specifically there because diplomats are *not* subject to a jurisdiction when in a country - that’s why they have diplomatic immunity.
They exist outside the normal operations of state jurisdiction.
comment in response to
post
2/3
They claim people in the country illegally or temporarily are not “subject to the jurisdiction of”
But if you entered a country illegally and stole something you’d still be charged with theft - why?
Because you’re subject to their jurisdiction.
comment in response to
post
4/4
The 9th amendment and 10th amendment protect your unlisted rights, and the 14th amendment defines your equal protection.
You can *NEVER* be denied any due process, right or liberty, because of who you are, how you choose to live your life or how you identify.
Or for what box you tick.
comment in response to
post
3/4
And 1 in 15,000 women, who are born as women and live their life’s and women and have a traditional “feminine” appearance are XY chromosomes.
Even the science of Gender is complex.
And so even if things get reduced down to M/F on forms you need to know: you have rights.
comment in response to
post
2/4
Plus the science is on your side.
While most people are XX or XY, 0.42% of humans (1in 240 people) are born with different sex chromosomes, which can include:
47,XXX 47,XYY, 45,X, 47,XXY, 48,XXXX, 49,XXXXX, 48,XXYY, 48,XXXY, 49,XXXXXY
comment in response to
post
2/2
The most logical interpretation is foreign espionage craft using UAS systems.
But, we do ourselves a disservice in mocking investigations and jumping to the mundane - which is how these craft thrive.
We should always push for answers, and go where facts take us either way. 🤷♂️
comment in response to
post
1/2
Oooof Hank.
I’m actively working on a video about this topic, and am going to say this is a bit of a bad take.
We lack enough public evidence on this image to say *in either direction* conclusively what it is.
But given other public data around this it’s likely *not* a standard aircraft.
comment in response to
post
1000%
comment in response to
post
2/2
It imports $450B/year from Canada vs $500B/year from China.
That’s why NAFTA exists.
Getting into a trade war with Canada, grinds the US economy to a halt.
Meanwhile, plenty of other countries are hungry to buy more oil and more rare earth minerals…
comment in response to
post
15/15
Trump may be a useful idiot.
But people like Gabbard, are likely, knowing, purposeful, compromised assets - capable of undermining US national security for decades to come.
comment in response to
post
14/15
Trumps odd picks, any of which have been accused of being Russian assets, are deeply concerning.
Russia has always had dangerous influence campaigns in the US, but we’ve never been so close to those assets being appointed to the highest offices, with broad intelligence access.
comment in response to
post
13/15
-The RNC and DNC email systems had similar set ups, and have previously been reviewed by the same federal security contractors. Suggesting the difference was once again that the DNC had an insider.
-None of the emails leaked came after the date Gabbard resigned.
comment in response to
post
12/15
-The ODNI, CIA and FBI, found no specific exploit used to access the emails, which often (but not always) means an insider created a backdoor and removed it after the hack.
-The ODNI claims that Russia tried to get access to RNC emails, but was unsuccessful.
comment in response to
post
11/15
-Gabbard was supposedly interviewed by the FBI.
-Gabbard is on the US Marshall’s watchlist called “Quiet Skies” which high risk suspects and operatives are often placed on. The reason she was added to the list is unknown.
-The ODNI investigated the DNC email hack.
comment in response to
post
10/15
Going back to the DNC email hack, we know:
-Gabbard suddenly resigned and supported Bernie, which Russia was pushing to divide the Dems at the time.
-Gabbard emails were never leaked.
-Executive emails were included, which required high level access.
comment in response to
post
9/15
While Gabbard denies the meeting, it’s notable that she was the rep at the time, and the renaming failed.
So it’s quite possible Gabbard was developed as an asset years ago.
The SVR (modern day KGB) often develops assets by starting with small asks, and building a relationship.
comment in response to
post
8/15
In turn, they had operatives engage with local government officials to try and prevent the renaming.
This included Branson, the same Russia agent who donated to Gabbard - who was CC’d on emails about the renaming matter.
comment in response to
post
7/15
At the time, there was an initiative to rename the “Russian Fort Elizabeth” on the Hawaiian island of Kauai, which was named because of the Russian-American company that founded it in 1815.
According to the FBI Russian officials didn’t want to “wipe Russian history” away from the fort.
comment in response to
post
6/15
Not only did her 2020 run see broad support from Russian propaganda sites and donations of pro-Putin Russians in the US, but she’s also likely the representative named in an FBI report on foreign influence in Hawaii back in 2018/2019.
comment in response to
post
5/15
Even Senator Romney has called her out for parroting Kremlin propaganda about “biolabs” in Ukraine, and engagement with pro-Russian regimes in Syria and Iran.
But her affiliation with Russia stems even further back.
comment in response to
post
4/15
Trump has made a lot of dumb quid-pro-quo cabinet choices.
But Tulsi Gabbard is the most dangerous.
comment in response to
post
3/15
Since her nomination to the DNI, Russia has publicly praised her, but five-eyes partners have spoken out in concern, going as far as to say that the US would not be “read-in” to sensitive intelligence matters from partners if she’s at the helm.
comment in response to
post
2/15
Then Gabbard started appearing on Tucker Carlsons show - which, Canadian intelligence forces have reported as one of the US media companies receiving payments from the Kremlin operated RT.
Gabbard also received funds directly from Elena Branson, after she visited the Russian Embassy in 2019.