adversematch.bsky.social
69 posts
44 followers
221 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Hey Janet Albrechtsen, your mate Bruce Lehrmann is in court for allegedly stealing a car. I assume you’re going to mount a campaign asserting his innocence, painting him as the hapless victim of an unfair plot by a car pretending it was stolen for attention?
comment in response to
post
So brave and virtuous.
comment in response to
post
So? Jesus Christ!
comment in response to
post
Hysterical little man-baby
comment in response to
post
I've already stated reasons above, the timing feels suspect.
comment in response to
post
Do you think Brereton was purely apolitical?
comment in response to
post
Feels a bit opportune to placate the teal/independents ahead of a potential Labor minority gov.
comment in response to
post
Nothing to do with a looming election, surely?
comment in response to
post
Agreed, the future is fucking bleak.
comment in response to
post
The geographical boundaries changing almost on a daily basis as Israel illegally encroaches on its territory. 140 countries have already recognised Palestine statehood, but if Labor did the same it would be opposing the US (heaven forbid) and suffer the eternal wrath of the Zionist lobby here.
comment in response to
post
The PLO declared independence of Israel in 1988 and since then Australia has never formally acknowledged the region as Palestine. I would've thought that a critical first step.
Also, I now appear blocked by Van Badham. Not sure what in my post was so grievously inaccurate or offensive.. ?
comment in response to
post
Oops! Kim would like a quick word Patty.
comment in response to
post
Australia doesn't even recognize Palestine as a state, let alone genuinely supporting a two state solution.
comment in response to
post
Outstanding work
comment in response to
post
Only if you let him, darl.
comment in response to
post
This is genuinely fascinating! What a sick mind he has.
comment in response to
post
Just dripping with awfulness.
comment in response to
post
Are they worse than the Libs though? That's the point here.
comment in response to
post
Dead-cat culture wars.
"Look over there!" until the election (and not too closely to our policy abyss).
comment in response to
post
Preach!
comment in response to
post
There is no excuse now:
www.theguardian.com/science/2025...
comment in response to
post
Hell YES!!
comment in response to
post
My vain hope is he's putting all his eggs in that one basket and the Trump/MAGA brand will be so unequivocally toxic by the election it will sink him by association.
comment in response to
post
You've missed my point entirely about the majors being paid for: www.marketforces.org.au/politicaldon...
Labor is still opening coal mines in the face of a climate emergency. Who are they accountable to? Time is running the fuck out for planet Earth.
comment in response to
post
I agree with you. But I'm also not wrong, am I?
comment in response to
post
Labor needs external checks and balances. Fossil fuel corps have them in their back pocket and they've shown they can't be trusted with the environment.
You've proudly declared yourself an environmentalist on the WoW, so how on earth is a business-as-usual Labor majority the best outcome?
comment in response to
post
I can't continue this pal, you keep creating strawmen.
comment in response to
post
Where did I say that?
comment in response to
post
No I don't think he cares about anyone but himself. That doesn't change the fact you were making a false equivalence.
comment in response to
post
Just as much? The US is funding a literal genocide in Gaza. No comparison.
comment in response to
post
This is hilarious. Why was it rejected in the first place??
comment in response to
post
Zionist lobby has a stranglehold on Aunty. No other feasible reason to pursue this.
comment in response to
post
Amazing, well done 👍
comment in response to
post
Albo kisses the ring early on, like they all do. No surprise here.
comment in response to
post
Were Labor somehow unable to negotiate with him?