akodiak.bsky.social
46 posts
19 followers
16 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Is stifling innovation the latest buzzword for scaming the populace?
comment in response to
post
Sadly, you are correct. I have seen a segment of the populace salivating at the thought of deporting citizens for their crimes.
comment in response to
post
And yet the current regime is floating that very idea. So not very rhetorical under the circumstances. Unless you think spines will be grown at some point.
comment in response to
post
You just did
comment in response to
post
Guatemala allegedly.
It looks they've bent the knee and may be willing to take anyone.
comment in response to
post
The spectacle probably
comment in response to
post
Republicans added it to a foreign aid bill, knowing it wouldn't be rejected.
comment in response to
post
Hunter would have been hounded relentlessly in retaliation of Trump being charged with actual crimes.
comment in response to
post
So you can't dispute anything she's saying? Do I have that right?
comment in response to
post
Seems reasonable
comment in response to
post
Went to the mainland for the Grey Cup game
comment in response to
post
It was. There may even be some left today when I get home from my adventure
comment in response to
post
Shitty?
Too soon?
comment in response to
post
Elder spawn made buffalo chicken dip and even surprised herself with how good it was.
comment in response to
post
Sometimes, I let the garbage take itself out
comment in response to
post
I somehow missed the bottom part. But it does put the final nail in your centrist coffin.
Trump is the scam. Trump is and always has been out for Trump. FOH
comment in response to
post
You didn't hear her say she would appoint a Republican to her cabinet? You didn't see her campaigning with anti-Trump Republicans.
You're not making it easy to believe you're some enlightened centrist.
comment in response to
post
Let's see on one side you had someone willing to work across the aisle and on the other side you have someone threatening their own party to fall in line..
comment in response to
post
You hate tribal politics but voted for the most tribalistic candidate...
Doubt
comment in response to
post
And yet you have confirmed yourself tribalistic by labeling others...
comment in response to
post
I learned it from the right actually.
I was just curious where the line is drawn on lawfare
But thanks for confirming your heretofore unobvious bias /s
comment in response to
post
Like Aileen Cannon on the otherside
comment in response to
post
Back atch bucko. I hear X is the place for you folk
comment in response to
post
I said sure, champ. I'm not sure what else you want.
NY is out to get Trump and is rewriting criminal and civil codes just to get Trump and never did nuttin wrong.
Every criminal and civil case ever brought against has been in revenge, and the man is a saint
comment in response to
post
Uh-huh. Sure champ.
comment in response to
post
Cool. I'll give your opinion the weight it is due
comment in response to
post
Yup. I'm sure they enacted for the express purpose of getting Trump.
Or maybe, she just took advantage of the change
comment in response to
post
Not at all
He's only an adjudicated rapist because the clock had run out for him to be a criminal rapist.
Semantics
comment in response to
post
Civil or criminal, the facts remain and the only difference is time.
It is a nice deflection though
comment in response to
post
Only because the statute had run out criminally but don't get it twisted, he's a rapist
comment in response to
post
Not mine, the judges.
I have been given no reason to take your word over his
comment in response to
post
Cool story.
I'm gonna stick with judge.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Ok.
Declare judiciary.
And they did so, yup he's an adjudicated rapist
comment in response to
post
No. It's was the MAGA troll but it looks like OP blocked me
comment in response to
post
Bummer. It looks like the wrong person thought I called them an asshole.
comment in response to
post
Aren't they always when they disagree with you.
I said adjuicated not convicted.
Perhaps you should try reading.
Fact remains he's an adjudicated rapist according to the judge who over saw the case
comment in response to
post
I can understand the judges' words quite clearly they contradict you who was not the judge in the case
comment in response to
post
www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
comment in response to
post
Adjudacted rapist
comment in response to
post
As if on cue a wild asshole appears
comment in response to
post
It's next. I picked up Banishers: Ghosts of New Eden with a birthday BOGO, and it might be too good to put aside right now.
comment in response to
post
I picked up Veilguard yesterday because Gamestop didn't have Lego Horizon Adventures.
Logic isn't my strong suit
comment in response to
post
Indeed.
comment in response to
post
Subtle. I like it.