alek.bsky.social
Doing my share to help the digital commons grow. Director of Strategy at openfuture.eu, sociologist and digital activist. European perspective on global challenges. Board Chair at Centrum Cyfrowe, Board Member at Wikimedia Europe. Bread, tea, apples.
95 posts
379 followers
373 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
there’s so much uncertainty about legal status of training on data that a fully open licensed dataset creates a pathway that might feel like more legally secure for some actors
comment in response to
post
Mike, I agree. At @openfuture.bsky.social we commissioned a study on copyleft and derivation in AI dev, and I expected more follow-up conversations.
I also agree with @stellaathena.bsky.social that this is more a model-building, rather than dataset-building issue
comment in response to
post
There is so much talk about re-industrialization; but our collective imagination of “industry” is stuck in the previous era: we see steelmills, coal mines, car factories. And forget that they are today full of researchers, chips, and robots.
comment in response to
post
And environmental sustainability can't be an afterthought. The Action Plan acknowledges some energy and water concerns but a more robust framework is needed to limit AI’s environmental impact.
greenscreen.network/en/blog/with...
comment in response to
post
Who will orchestrate this complex plan? We need an agency with capacity to coordinate AI deployment across sectors while ensuring compliance with digital rights. Definitely more than just an “observatory” proposed in the Action Plan.
comment in response to
post
And more resources should go to projects like DARE at the Barcelona Supercomputing Center, which develops alternative, open chip architectures for AI training.
eurohpc-ju.europa.eu/research-inn...
comment in response to
post
Stronger data governance is needed, ensuring access but with sufficient guardrails.
The upcoming Data Union Strategy and proposed Data Labs are promising starts, but we need a proper Knowledge Commons to address what Stefaan Verhulst calls a "data winter."
sverhulst.medium.com/are-we-enter...
comment in response to
post
A major gap: no commitment to developing a flagship, state-of-the-art, open-source European frontier model. EU-based labs have proven they can build small models. It's time to pool their resources into a model that embodies European values at scale.
comment in response to
post
The EU correctly aims to reduce dependency on dominant commercial players with investments in compute. But success will require more than just mobilising funding for ever bigger amounts of GPUs.
comment in response to
post
Is joining a race the right goal for a public policy? A stronger vision of purposeful AI deployment is needed if it is to do more than just boost commercial AI development.
#publicAI
comment in response to
post
That’s a very interesting idea, and I agree that we need some form of regulation to force AI companies to reciprocate. Yet it’s hard to imagine such code just for Wikimedia - so how broad do you make it? Very quickly you probably have to consider a web-wide tax.
comment in response to
post
Still, the paper offers a positive vision, but little clarity on how to get there, if all the big labs are stuck in the transformer / diffusion paradigms.
(Upcoming #publicAI paper that Im writing argues that research into alternative paradigms should be key to any public intervention)
comment in response to
post
And it’s interesting to see #interoperability (not often discussed in the #AI space) as a key principle for model plurality.
comment in response to
post
Against this backdrop, @wikipedia.org stands out as a unique, global platform and civic initiative. High time to think of it as much more than an encyclopedia: a bulwark for XXI century, knowledge-based, democratic order. A collective good in a world of private tech empires.
comment in response to
post
Also, this: arstechnica.com/tech-policy/...
comment in response to
post
That's true, I tend to focus on the copyright-adjacent preference signalling space. And the BlueSky proposal is indeed not based on (c).
But I'm not aware of alternatives that offer strong foundations for enforcement. Labour disputes get mentioned, but they are not widely applicable.
comment in response to
post
the case is interesting because it's NOT #AI use. Seems that #genAI scraping has turned the issue of reuse from a possibility to a (hard) reality for some #glam and #oa institutions
comment in response to
post
One more example of what increasingly looks like a trend: various #open collections shift to a "yes, but" posture.
#aicommons
comment in response to
post
I think that this extrapolates beyond digital cash, to other forms of #publicdigitalinfrastructure. Leading to the question: as we debate #digitalcommons, do we have clarity on how analog, physical, IRL solutions fit into the picture?
comment in response to
post
Enforcement is generally not something that you worry about when dealing with sharing frameworks.
(I’m assuming that BlueSky aims to make sharing sustainable through finetuning)
comment in response to
post
And more generally, enforcement is the Achilles heel of most proposals for balanced control/sharing. Not just this one, but also RAIL licenses, open source AI standards, etc. They are all meant to be community norms to which actors adhere in good faith.
comment in response to
post
In the US context, such advocacy is almost impossible to imagine, because it would suggest that fair use does not apply. It’s hard for me to imagine this changing until courts reach a decision.
comment in response to
post
And #dma2 banner should be picked up by everyone who supports #dpi #eurostack proposals
comment in response to
post
Success failure of this initiative is an interesting litmus test of how EU navigates its digital sovereignty vs broader geopolitical stakes
comment in response to
post
I know that comparisons like this are hard but since Hungary is now often brought up, I think it’s worth looking at Poland’s “post-patrimonic” moment
comment in response to
post
In Poland, the previous govt bent / broke the law a lot, but still relinquished power after democratic elections. And now admittedly “putting people in jail” is a hard and slow process - that also stops the current govt from proactively doing new, useful things.
comment in response to
post
@alek.bsky.social will present research on #OpenSourceAI by @opensource.org and Open Future—featuring insights from #DataGovernance experts—examining how #OpenAI can prioritize public access over private commodification.
📙 openfuture.eu/publication/...