aliromah.bsky.social
Barrister One Pump Court Chambers. Frome. London. Trustee of Kalayaan. Tweeting personal views on rule of law, nationality, immigration, asylum, Court of Protection, passion & whimsy. Unafraid.
261 posts
2,118 followers
227 following
Prolific Poster
comment in response to
post
Amendment 2* to clause 4? Explantory statement envisages it as a wrecking amendment that it will stop the Bill coming into force. Those who wrote it may be suprised if Bill's sponsor turns around & accepts it. There are circumstances in which it would be a clever amendment. This is not one of them.
comment in response to
post
Also, proposals positively discourage circular migration, which any government that wants people not to stay should be encouraging.
comment in response to
post
It seems to me the Tribunal is better placed to make sense of prolix or unfocused grounds than the litigant in person. I struggle to think of another jurisdiction where this "tough luck that you have no lawyer" approach, which denies access to justice, woud be enshrined in a judgment in these terms
comment in response to
post
Jacob Rees-Moggs' father Lord Rees Mogg, opposed the stripping of citizenship from those born British during the passage of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 see hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2002-1...
comment in response to
post
I wrote about it a long time ago philarchive.org/archive/MALCAG
comment in response to
post
Made me think of 1947 Commonwealth Conference on Nationality & Citizenship - not everyone's first port of call. But pondering questions engaging all: does this follow from Rottmann? Do you need a genuine link? Could any philanthropic investments create one? Relationship to current role of ius soli?