andrewb610.bsky.social
204 posts
58 followers
35 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Also, that’s not to agree with Jennings of course. Dodger stadium is private property.
comment in response to
post
And it’s not defamation to say he’s fine with them suing. Saying they actually obstructed would even still be borderline.
comment in response to
post
Where’s the obsidian?
I’m glad I’m not the only one who saw that
comment in response to
post
Isn’t reactionary centrist an oxymoron?
Again, this attitude is why the right wins - they focus on winning first and stabbing each other in the back after.
comment in response to
post
If only we had an actual OSC who cared to enforce that.
comment in response to
post
The government should fear the people. Always remember the 2nd amendment doesn’t have an R-only limitation.
comment in response to
post
I don’t think she needs the speech and debate clause, and I don’t think it applies outside of Congress itself, but I’m no expert so there’s probably some caveat I’m missing.
comment in response to
post
I like the “these are professional, paid protesters”.
Bondi knows. She wrote the checks.
comment in response to
post
Treason, bribery, and whatever else you think is worth impeaching over.
It’s nice that they made it open ended.
comment in response to
post
He’d still be better than a Republican.
If he wins he still wouldn’t be a Republican.
If he doesn’t win the primary then the system works too.
comment in response to
post
It’s been fact checked as false somewhere if I recall what I saw yesterday correctly.
comment in response to
post
Insert “first time?” Meme here.
comment in response to
post
That’s probably the best comparison, especially for cases involving those injured by second hand smoke.
comment in response to
post
As soon as happened all Republican attorneys general would file every BS charge they could against the left to maintain their grip on power.
It sounds like common sense but it’s a TERRIBLE idea.
comment in response to
post
This is a great way to create a weaponized government. The party in power would seek politicly motivated convictions to bar their opponents from running under the most BS circumstances.
The first man to get electoral votes from prison wasn’t a Republican, he was a socialist.
comment in response to
post
The Knicks are the Celtics of this series.
Pacers in 6.
comment in response to
post
I suppose if the standard is less than but for cause then perhaps.
comment in response to
post
Because it won’t go anywhere. It’s probably too attenuated to pin on oil and gas companies, especially when society at large is responsible for the demand of the energy they produce.
comment in response to
post
I’m a classic beta male - I only let a select few try me and I get better after every interaction.
comment in response to
post
I had to do some Google-fu on this and found that this was indeed a real order properly issued by this district court.
Apparently the 5th circuit makes all their lower courts prints their orders in the same pretentious font.
comment in response to
post
Something hit close to home so she changed her opinion? That just shows she’s capable of thought.
Trump doubles down even when it hits him personally.
comment in response to
post
If you learn something new, the test is successful.
Testing is about gathering data and informing design, not (necessarily) about achieving all objectives (thought that’s always a bonus).
If this test failed it never would have executed.
comment in response to
post
It also gives them zero repercussions if Congress decides to ignore all the misdeeds and sit idly by.
comment in response to
post
This doesn’t even have to make sense for me to support it!
comment in response to
post
It’s not widespread but it’s happened in New Mexico
comment in response to
post
My Mexican wife tells me she doesn’t like to be out in the sun too long for this reason.
comment in response to
post
Neil Gorsuch would like a word with this judge.
Seriously, Neil Gorsuch WROTE BOSTOCK!
comment in response to
post
For the traitor appears not a traitor…. I suppose it mostly fits.
comment in response to
post
Feds absolutely do this and courts absolutely sign off on this
comment in response to
post
The guy with the bullhorn nobody cares about lol.
comment in response to
post
States rights actually don’t, the 10th amendment refers to powers not explicitly granted in the constitution to the states, and immigration enforcement is granted to the Feds, plus there’s the supremacy clause.
But they aren’t immune from the 4th Amendment.
comment in response to
post
I want to be that guy that says stop the circular firing squads and stop fighting each other and focus on winning elections.
But maybe we need this turnover to get back to winning.
comment in response to
post
Deleted my spoiler (to an episode of a show over 60 years old)
comment in response to
post
There are 2 things I can’t stand in this world - people who are intolerant of other people’s cultures…. And (white descendants of) the Dutch!
comment in response to
post
Breaking? Wasn’t this last week?
comment in response to
post
What about elevensies?
comment in response to
post
But did he get his grapes?
comment in response to
post
Found the Cowboys fan
comment in response to
post
It’s actually not all terrible - this was the Army getting ahead of Doge and doing it their way, not Musks way.
comment in response to
post
Like you, I’m a human being with valid opinions, not all popular. But by all means, continue to dehumanize me, just like the right does.
comment in response to
post
Unless she’s a Republican, it really doesn’t make a difference right now. But I suppose it’s something…
comment in response to
post
There’s a lot of that in the Constitution, and there’s places where citizen is mentioned which means the drafters knew how to differentiate between the 2 and chose to use “persons” over citizens in this particular amendment. In case you wanted some more support for your argument.
comment in response to
post
Had to pay the lawyer fees for tax evasion somehow I guess.
I hope dispatch gets illegally reposted without permission and goes bankrupt, but then again, nobody will want to repeat their fascist bullshit, let alone steal it.
comment in response to
post
What exactly legally disqualified him? And as I type I think you mean the 14th amendment and I think, oh, you’re probably right.
comment in response to
post
Giving Pakistan nuclear weapons in response to India’s development of them was actually great foresight.
Or a terrible miscalculation depending on the news tomorrow.
comment in response to
post
They hadn’t yet been ruled against in court so it wasn’t against the law at the time, theoretically.
Plus, there’s way more impeachable offenses than this.