Profile avatar
annamaria.bsky.social
Public health journalist with ProPublica
9 posts 11,479 followers 105 following
Regular Contributor
comment in response to post
Overall, the bureau identified 72 activities that are life-saving. To date, none of these have been approved and no payments have been released, according to Enrich's memo. Then nearly all of them were terminated on Feb 27th.
comment in response to post
Then, on Feb 26, Secretary of State Marco Rubio terminated 5,000 USAID programs all at once, including care for malaria, TB and HIV. Shortly after political appointees told Enrich that they'd made some mistakes. "There is an acknowledgement some may have been sent out in error."
comment in response to post
In the weeks that followed, USAID received conflicting information on a near daily basis about whether waivers could continue and how. On Feb 24, political leadership said to deprioritize programs for mpox, polio, and Ebola, noting waivers for that work would not be approved.
comment in response to post
Then senior officials were told to start terminating some programs, including ones that had been flagged as life-saving.
comment in response to post
Nonprofits made clear to USAID staff that without payment, they couldn't continue their life-saving work. On Feb 7, senior officials acknowledged that all of USAID's payment systems had been shut off by DOGE, so funds couldn't go out.
comment in response to post
One early request was for the response to an Ebola outbreak in Uganda. Those programs got temporary permission to continue, but USAID has not been paying its bills, stranding programs. (More on that w/ my colleague Brett Murphy: www.propublica.org/article/trum...
comment in response to post
Starting Jan 29, staff scrambled to request life-saving waivers after all foreign aid was paused. Enrich sent an email on Jan 31st to three political appointees about waivers, but didn't get a response until Feb. 4, when one said to be "draconian" in what they approved.
comment in response to post
This is the first time we are hearing from senior leadership at USAID in this way, how political appointees impeded staff from continuing life-saving programs, and who did it.