anthonyjkennrgc.bsky.social
Black Indy Left Socialist; S*x+ Leftist, NOLA Saints fanatic, Vulgar MarXXXist. VERY LEFT OF CENTER. 🔞 ✊🏿💪😈🏳️🌈 (Featured booty = Latina Lefty MILF Gabby Quinteros.) #WarDamnIndyLeft
CA/VM: AnthonyJK6319 PyPl: anthonyjkenn YPM: AnthonyJKenn629
3,747 posts
2,361 followers
3,709 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Links: 💕💸 🙏🙏🙏🆘🚨🆘
cash.app/AnthonyJK6319
venmo.com/u/AnthonyJK6...
paypal.me/anthonyjkenn
ko-fi.com/anthonyjkenn...
youpay.me/AnthonyJKenn...
gogetfunding.com/help-anthony...
chuffed.org/project/1233...
comment in response to
post
Links: 💕💸 🙏🙏🙏🆘🚨🆘
cash.app/AnthonyJK6319
venmo.com/u/AnthonyJK6...
paypal.me/anthonyjkenn
ko-fi.com/anthonyjkenn...
youpay.me/AnthonyJKenn...
gogetfunding.com/help-anthony...
chuffed.org/project/1233...
comment in response to
post
they want moral panic did same thing during FOSTA SESTA. at some point every few years some assclown decides the mountain of dead hookers is not tall enough. one day i will be part of the mountain. thats the sex worker afterlife/retirement plan. horray
comment in response to
post
It’s interesting because the stunts they’re talking about only exist because institutions like the Daily Mail profit off of inciting public outcry over adults having consensual sex.
comment in response to
post
And it's important that we're not gaslit. This isn't about crime, or some "underbelly" of exploitation.
It's Christian nationalists, gender reactionaries and anti-sex censors feeling uncomfortable about sexuality and fomenting a panic about the largest creator revenue generator in the industry.
comment in response to
post
It worked. Banks got nervous and the platform almost buckled.
I'm not saying we're there yet. But I want to call attention to the growing efforts of the antiporn censors. This is a conservative moment and they're making use of all the tools — laws, intimidation, banking — to go after sex online.
comment in response to
post
She claimed that incidents of CSAM on OnlyFans had exploded 800% in just a year, calling it "a major marketplace" for illegal content.
It wasn't even close to true. In fact, percentage-wise, incidents of potentially illegal content had fallen dramatically. But they used raw numbers to gin up panic.
comment in response to
post
By all mainstream accounts, OnlyFans does everything right — extensive vetting, aggressive moderation, transparency, support for the Online Safety Act — the pinnacle of respectability politics in porn.
And they're still attacking it.
comment in response to
post
Unfortunately, with enough smoke, allegations get laundered into accepted fact. We saw this with Pornhub, we saw this with the "porn as a public health crisis."
You really have to hit this head on (and not with corporate speak) or it quickly builds as a pretext for censorship. So I worry.
comment in response to
post
A lot of has erupted since the Bonnie Blue and Lily Phillips stunts (both had sex with hundreds of men a day and are a fixture of non-porn media).
The alleged (but largely unsupported) claims of criminality seem to a way of addressing a panic about women's purity.
comment in response to
post
Reuters has been running its own anti-OF series with many of the same tactics
A whole article was written on a "whistleblower" report of allegations by "anti-trafficking" expert (who has been making the same claims for years). Visa investigated and couldn't find anything, which tells you something.
comment in response to
post
In the past month, I've been seeing headline after headline with sensational claims largely unsupported by the actual articles themselves.
Often the "crimes" reference have to do with attacks on creators themselves, like harassment or stalking. Or are nearly a decade old.
comment in response to
post
I fired my therapist for being a SWERF. It was fantastic. Up the Sex Workers and love and respect to all of ya. (Also I have a new therapist and they are lovely and supportive and unswerfy)
comment in response to
post
Here are three of the bills that are past due RIGHT NOW and threatening loss of services at any time if they are not paid IMMEDIATELY. This is not a joke or a scam. This is REAL. $110 worth of bills, not even all that is due. Really, if you can help me, please do!!
💸💕 🆘🚨🆘🙏🙏
comment in response to
post
It doesn't matter what Trump wants at this point, his administration is filled with Christian nationalists. Banning pornography is explicitly one of the objectives of P2025, and prosecuting SWers of any kind is not too far of a reach after that.
comment in response to
post
Trump is not interested in sex workers & he could care less not that it isn’t important but it doesn’t seem like something he would address unless someone with influence says something. Oh yeah & the chick who fucked 100 guys is pregnant btw too.
comment in response to
post
The proverbial ground on which you stand is foundational & solid, but yeah, most people won't set foot upon it. Folks in power pretend consensual SW is impossible, as it doesn't fit their views. SW should be protected, legal, and respected.
comment in response to
post
I may be a strong critic of liberalism from the Indy Left, but I am absolutely and unequivocally a supporter of sex worker and adult sexual media creator rights. The deep freeze you get from some Left circles is abhorrent and disgusting to me.
comment in response to
post
That just further proves my point. 🤠
comment in response to
post
Also want to add: I’ve reached out to several lefty creators with similar requests over the years, and I’ve almost always gotten a similar response. Kind of a general lack of enthusiasm followed by a paper thin vow of support. Ironically, if they’re worried about the stigma of discussing SW, well …
comment in response to
post
Because if you were really concerned about sex workers’ safety, you would already be aware of the threat we’re under.
You’d already be aware of it because you would have been listening to what sex workers have been very LOUDLY trying to tell you for years.
Anyway. Time to start a podcast again.
comment in response to
post
“My main concern is for the safety of the women in that industry.” It was clear they hadn’t really given the issue of SW rights much thought, so they said the best response they could think of in that moment.
I don’t disagree with their statement, of course, but it’s kind of a red flag to me. Why?
comment in response to
post
And I know a lot of those people would probably understand what’s at risk, if I could explain it to them. But if they’re already primed with a negative view of SW, how can I reach them?
So yeah, that’s where the rest of y’all come in. Please don’t leave us out of your conversations.
comment in response to
post
Like yes, of course there are the very outspoken militant SWERFs, but they don’t actually seem that prevalent.
However there are soooo many people on the left that fall for SWERFy talking points because they’re not actually engaging with sex workers in any way.
comment in response to
post
Related anecdote: recently I commented on a post by a prominent left political content creator. I asked if they’d consider doing a piece specifically addressing SW rights and the threat of censorship. The tone of their response was lukewarm:
comment in response to
post
The Daily Mail isn't taken seriously in the UK, it's always raging against something and only appeals to the looney far right.
comment in response to
post
And so we say no terfs, no swerfs, because all they’re doing is feeding other women to the state in the hopes of staying on power’s good side. Traitors.
comment in response to
post
The book makes the relevant point that only through anti-pornography "cultural feminism" was the state's co-opting of feminism possible.
Because Catherine MacKinnon, Andrea Dworking, and Susan Brownmiller used the power of the state to prosecute OTHER WOMEN.
comment in response to
post
Thank you so much 🪼💜