Profile avatar
anthonymkreis.bsky.social
Law professor and historical political scientist 📍Atlanta, Georgia Author of Rot and Revival: https://www.ucpress.edu/books/rot-and-revival/paper "A credible scholar." - Politico Studying constitutional law and American Political Development
7,094 posts 89,491 followers 4,226 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
Posts 36 Comments 14

On the Trump-Musk feud, @aoc.bsky.social: “Oh man, the girls are fighting, aren’t they?”

submitted 9 hours ago • 43 comments

I will reiterate for the benefit of Bluesky folks that this is not correct.

submitted 9 hours ago • 6 comments

Y’all. Stop. Tysm.

submitted 9 hours ago • 8 comments

submitted 10 hours ago • 8 comments

He is now calling for Trump to nationalize SpaceX lmao

submitted 11 hours ago • 103 comments

BREAKING: DC Circuit panel splits, 2-1, denying Trump administration's bid to move forward with firing of Inter-American Foundation Prez Sara Aviel. Majority: Katsas (Trump), Pillard (Obama). Dissent: Rao (Trump). Doc: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

submitted 12 hours ago • 4 comments

*sits down* Oh, do I have a story for you…

submitted 12 hours ago • 1 comment

Blessed and highly favored.

submitted 12 hours ago • 2 comments

submitted 12 hours ago • 1 comment

I cannot stop wheezing

submitted 13 hours ago • 2079 comments

In a nicer democracy, we could just have a snap election.

submitted 13 hours ago • 45 comments

Bannon calling on Trump to deport Elon. Choose your own adventure today, kids.

submitted 13 hours ago • 10 comments

hahahahhahahahah *breathes* hahahahahhahahahahaahah www.nytimes.com/live/2025/06...

submitted 13 hours ago • 6 comments

screaming crying throwing up

submitted 13 hours ago • 6 comments

A coalition falling on the weight of its success? 🤷‍♂️

submitted 13 hours ago • 3 comments

submitted 14 hours ago • 5 comments

today

submitted 15 hours ago • 89 comments

Every Pride Month, there must be one messy breakup. I don't make the rules. But the proof is in the pudding today.

submitted 14 hours ago • 8 comments

THIS FIGHT IS REAL

submitted 14 hours ago • 15 comments

me watching elon and donald fight

submitted 14 hours ago • 9 comments

Live by targeted retaliatory cuts; die by targeted retaliatory cuts.

submitted 15 hours ago • 8 comments

they're fighting

submitted 16 hours ago • 23 comments

Never mind, I watched this again. He thought he landed a good German joke. He's just an ass.

submitted 17 hours ago • 4 comments

This guy is just historically illiterate.

submitted 17 hours ago • 14 comments

Giving NAACP v. Alabama vibes.

submitted 17 hours ago • 2 comments

I really dislike this framing. Title VII protects traits, not groups. It isn't a "reverse discrimination" claim. This has been the law of federal anti-discrimination law for a very, very long time. See, McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transp. Co., 427 U.S. 273 (1976).

submitted 19 hours ago • 11 comments

I am puzzled by the serenity w/which @jadler1969.bsky.social and @williambaude.bsky.social describe Wilcox’s carveout for the Fed. It’s an admission that the unitary executive project was sold on false premises. For a radically activist line of cases, that’s a big deal! reason.com/volokh/2025/...

submitted 19 hours ago • 10 comments

The Court really cleared a good bit of the unanimous underbrush today. The storm is coming.

submitted 19 hours ago • 9 comments

Last case, Lab Corp v. Davis, is a DIG. That's a wrap from the Supreme Court.

submitted 19 hours ago • 1 comment

Only Thomas or Roberts will have the remaining opinion(s).

submitted 19 hours ago • 0 comments

A Thomas opinion on civil procedure rules. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...

submitted 19 hours ago • 0 comments

SUPREME COURT: CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd. v. Antrix Corp. FSIA case. Alito, J., for a unanimous Court. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...

submitted 19 hours ago • 0 comments

SUPREME COURT: Catholic Charities v. Wi. Labor: A state exemption that turns on whether a religious org proselytizes or serve only co-religionists and not “‘secular criteria" constitutes a 1A violation. Sotomayor, J. for the unanimous Court. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...

submitted 19 hours ago • 3 comments

More opinions coming. Nothing will come from Trump appointees today.

submitted 19 hours ago • 0 comments

SUPREME COURT: Smith and Wesson. Because Mexico’s complaint does not plausibly allege that the defendant gun manufacturers aided and abetted gun dealers’ unlawful sales of firearms to Mexican traffickers, PLCAA bars the lawsuit. Kagan, J., for a unanimous Court. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...

submitted 19 hours ago • 1 comment

SUPREME COURT: Ames v. Ohio. A heterosexual employee can bring a sexual orientation claim under Title VII for employment discrimination as sex discrimination without a heightened standard. Jackson, J., for a unanimous Court. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...

submitted 19 hours ago • 1 comment