Profile avatar
as-king.bsky.social
Author of books. Maker of art. Speaker of speeches. Part squid/part earthquake. Literacy fanatic. Lover of corn. Ardent supporter of teenagers. Founder of šŸ³ļøā€šŸŒˆ Gracie's House: www.gracieshouse.com. She/her https://linktr.ee/AS_King
130 posts 2,173 followers 1,964 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
I needed this guy so much today.
comment in response to post
Hooker is still poisoning peopleā€”except a majority of the men who dumped those barrels are no longer alive. The chemicals are. And they will be for a long time. All to say: in a time of powerful rich men full of toxic lies and propaganda, be a Dobson. Be a Bennett. Be a Lois Gibbs. Speak up.
comment in response to post
Heroes never really know how their actions will matter until they act heroically. Dobsonā€™s whistleblowing came after editor Darwin Bennettā€™s refusal to be silenced no matter how heavy the threats. Sadly, toxic waste doesnā€™t just go away. In Love Canal, and in all the dump locations. . .
comment in response to post
Warren Dobson was a former worker at the Hooker plant. He reported the illegal dumping. Thatā€™s what broke the story. The heroes willing to speak up. The Michigan DNR came in and did their job. The company was fined and civil suits ensued. But I keep thinking about the front page of the Observer.
comment in response to post
Hooker chemical employed a lot of people in that little town. Same in Niagara Falls, too, where Lois Gibbs was fighting for her community. Many people felt they had to side with the folks who were poisoning their families. Until they didnā€™t anymore. The Michigan story started w/ another brave man.
comment in response to post
ā€œFor weeks Iā€™ve agonized over what to do about these attempts at censorship of the news. . . We will not carry any more news concerning state action against this company, just a blank story where the story should have appeared.ā€ ā€œIā€™m sure the firm would rather you call them for any information.ā€
comment in response to post
So after the White Lake Observer editor was threatened, rather than print the stories he had about Hookerā€™s crimes, he left areas of the front page completely blank. And he wrote an accompanying column apologizing for ā€œnot printing all the news this week.ā€ It gets better.
comment in response to post
More than 20,000 barrels of [leaking] toxic waste were piled outside the plant there, and there was proof Hooker knew how dangerous their dumping was. They were already trying to brainwash the public through a bold propaganda advertising campaign that worked. Until it didnā€™t.
comment in response to post
If that name sounds familiar, Hooker Chemical was also the cause of the Love Canal disaster in Niagara Falls, NY, and several other toxic waste disasters around Niagara, Michigan, and beyond. Anyway. The White Lake Observer was heavily ā€œpressuredā€ [threatened] by Hooker to not report the story.
comment in response to post
Yeah. It was a memorable letter. On distinctive letterhead. Kinda canā€™t wait to find it and add it to the archives. It can live forever thanks to librarians. šŸ•ŗ
comment in response to post
Facts. The rest of the letter was as amazingly out of touch as the opening. I still have it.
comment in response to post
Thank you. I had far worse things happen after that tragedy. If I told you, your jaw would be on the floor a while. It taught me a lot about people, for sure.
comment in response to post
This. So much this.
comment in response to post
PERFECT ANSWER! *chefā€™s kiss*
comment in response to post
Iā€™ll start. *I slept in most days until I felt rested. *I became a cat. *I got the zoomies. *I scratched the wallpaper right of the wall because I felt like it. *I shat on the kitchen floor and then became immortal.
comment in response to post
Yeah. That must be so much better. Itā€™s a lot easier for me on the other side as a researcher for sure. Itā€™s funny. I have to go to look at some microfilm next week and I asked was it indexed, and the librarian was like, unfortunately no. Oof. I am so lucky I have dates for the articles I need.
comment in response to post
Itā€™s becoming a series.
comment in response to post
I will talk to you all day about toxic waste. And I almost did! šŸ˜¬ It was so great to hang outā€”soon we will do it in person. Until then, malicious compliance.
comment in response to post
Yes.
comment in response to post
Nope.
comment in response to post
Yes! This one! Ugh. This one.
comment in response to post
"[Re: pregnancy] If it's a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down" Idk if it's my *favorite* per se, but it's the one I can't get out of my head šŸ« 
comment in response to post
Alsoā€”how about the mental exertion of HAVING A BABY? I mean, the more I think about this the more I understand how it was never about fragile minds. It was always about control.
comment in response to post
Yeah. That one sticks with you. Iā€™ll add the NASA guys who gave a woman 100 tampons for one period. Something tells me they probably didnā€™t know the answer to that now-favorite question: can women pee with a tampon? either.
comment in response to post
Or how fertility works. Share your favorite ā€œpolitician explaining ladypartsā€ examples here.
comment in response to post
You are the kindest human. Canā€™t wait to see you soon! Iā€™m gonna bring a crockpot full of something delicious. šŸ‘€
comment in response to post
Iā€™ve been here a while. But Iā€™m juggling. The usual!