asrahn.bsky.social
Kämpar för den ålliberala världsordningen
538 posts
240 followers
60 following
Prolific Poster
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Det faktiska "sosseriet" som det bör klagas på
comment in response to
post
We must all walk into the woods, comrade, and die from starvation. Only then will our words merit consideration.
comment in response to
post
Inför totalförbud mot dubbla stolar för politiker. Karenstid, lobbyistregister, you name it. Folkvalda ska inte jobba på uppdrag av sina polare i något bolag eller med dolda intentioner.
comment in response to
post
Ja här kom det
comment in response to
post
The rich do. The same rich that bribe both parties.
comment in response to
post
Ta klivet, kamrat Lindvall, och gå med oss mot en faktisk framtid
comment in response to
post
"from a very left point of view"
Looks inside
Liberal Zionist
comment in response to
post
"It's freely given or it isn't" sure sounds less like principled solidarity and more like distributing mercy entirely dependent on personal grievances.
comment in response to
post
Salary high(er)? This means basic relations to production is different somehow. Me very smart.
comment in response to
post
Gränsen för "allmännas ingripande" är i huvudsak vad som separerar ekonomisk höger- och vänsterpolitik överlag. Mitt argument i den bemärkelsen är att L främst differentierat sig från övriga högern via vissa progressiva sociala positioner. Det är just dessa som övergivits i favör för det ekonomiska.
comment in response to
post
Partiet har absolut gjort sig självt obsolet. Min cyniska sida ser det som att samma ekonomiska politik framförs som förr, men utan en fernissa av progressivitet så finns ingen anledning att binda sig till partiet utan man kan bekvämt rösta direkt på Moderaterna osv.
comment in response to
post
Målen uppnås ju också under brunhögern. Privatiseringarna fortsätter, nedskärningarna fortsätter, anti-fackliga reformer fortsätter. Man får allt på silverfat och grymheterna är bara en bonus. Fascismen slår vakt om kapitalet som vanligt.
comment in response to
post
:)
comment in response to
post
Will's understanding of WW2 is a combination of american exceptionalism and the brain damage sustained from approximately 120 Enemy At The Gates viewings, all powered by the liberal poster spirit. Truly a marvel to behold.
comment in response to
post
The Soviets also tried for literal years to form a large anti-nazi pact with the west, and were continuously rebuffed. After Munich they realized where things were headed, and signed the M-R Pact while preparing for the inevitable invasion to come.
comment in response to
post
The expansionism of the Nazis was a fundamental part of their ideology, and still is. The fact that he looked upon the US and saw its insanely brutal racial laws, its establishment through colonial genocide, its irredentism and anti-communism, and liked it, that's just reality. Denying that is nuts.
comment in response to
post
This is moving the goalposts. No one is saying it was Hitler's "sole motivation". We're saying a significant part of his ideological rationale was explicitly inspired by those same atrocities you mention, and you are directly denying this in the face of reality.
comment in response to
post
No it fucking wasn't. Hitler wasn't taking on the guise of some self-proclaimed villain role intent on kamikazing US reputation by starting a world war. This is fucking nonsense. You can see what his views and motivations were by what he did, and what he did was try to replicate the US west.
comment in response to
post
This isn't fucking GI Joe or some shitty Marvel script where the US magically is the victim of some contrived conspiracy. It's the cold reality and if you're too much of a national chauvinist to be able to swallow it, that's a You Problem that no paltry attempt at historical revisionism will solve.
comment in response to
post
Looking to the US as an "example" of the musings of old Prussian philosophers does not make the fact any less real. It was a building block, a rationale and justification for future actions, not some weird ploy to tarnish the US reputation while fully aware he was the "bad guy" of his era.