bbstats.bsky.social
basketball analytics person
data science @ NFL
130 posts
2,453 followers
1,577 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
(psst, the Pacers had 5 fewer turnovers than OKC)
comment in response to
post
a sauteed cherry tomato is the single most flavorful food in existence
comment in response to
post
Bless u
comment in response to
post
@lucashaupt.bsky.social explain this to me
comment in response to
post
When I tell you it's the most seamless
comment in response to
post
breaking actually
comment in response to
post
someone needs to make a bluesky bot called "is it better than gemini" and the answer is always "no"
comment in response to
post
My office is also the laundry room so it gets some traffic
comment in response to
post
Counterpoint: they played saxophones
comment in response to
post
Yeah it dead ends quick lol
comment in response to
post
If you're debugging by hand you're not vibe coding
comment in response to
post
sounds like it!
comment in response to
post
AI is annoying and not great for many use cases, often bad for society as well...but unless you've used Gemini 2.5 (clobbers the competition), you might as well be talking about Markov chains
comment in response to
post
Sounds like someone hasn't used Gemini 2.5
comment in response to
post
💯
comment in response to
post
unbelievable
comment in response to
post
20 minutes?????
comment in response to
post
(on the android app)
comment in response to
post
Image stuff isn't amazing. Everything else is sota
comment in response to
post
but yeah me too lol
comment in response to
post
it all makes sense now...
comment in response to
post
10% lead seems impossible lol
comment in response to
post
I do not use Bluetooth for mixing or mastering, these are wired outputs
comment in response to
post
:)
comment in response to
post
I am the "they" you're talking about by the way :)
yes - it's always .WAV. I use LSR305s for my monitors and use ATH-M50x (which are less flat but more interesting and have great treble response). Lossless = marketing/not dramatic enough to matter in most cases - more important is bandwidth/storage
comment in response to
post
but let's just ask a mastering engineer whose albums win grammies every year what they think -- @danshike.bsky.social what say ye?
comment in response to
post
:) interesting theory!
But, I bet you $3 I score higher on the abx.digitalfeed.net test than you! :)
#NyquistBelieversStandUp
comment in response to
post
otherwise it's just marketing for "high quality"
comment in response to
post
If you only listen to classical music on 7506s, and were born after 2007, I could see it!
comment in response to
post
One time I could very very briefly hear the difference in 96khz and 44.1 and it took a lot of straining with the same audio file on loop
comment in response to
post
You do not ever need lossless audio.
comment in response to
post
Awesome