betterkevin.bsky.social
He/Him
I always repost Corgis.
*Citation needed.
3,869 posts
211 followers
141 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
*Cheese and Egg
comment in response to
post
I don't recall ever hearing this anywhere. Google hates it so much that searching for that exact phrase gets you "bacon, egg, and cheese" instead.
comment in response to
post
Is Bill Simmons still a thing? I thought his casual bigotry caught up to him.
comment in response to
post
Eddie helps me get through it.
comment in response to
post
Are we sure they weren't conjoined twins with "Brian" the left (or sinister) twin, so he was chained up in the attic living on buckets of fish heads?
We need to see Scalzi's scar. He might be the sinister left twin.
comment in response to
post
If you don't have dad jokes in your puzzle, what are you even doing?
comment in response to
post
Did you see the disclosure of the conflict of interest with the administrators and how it was supposedly mitigated?
comment in response to
post
It was a really good place. Had been a big chain that was failing, and the GM bought 3 of the locations to try to run them right under a rebrand.
I never did a self evaluation because I was complete shit as a waiter and didn't last long, but I saw others do them.
comment in response to
post
Namely: every policy and every enforcement action creates harm, both direct AND INDIRECT harm, whether the policy guides you to action or inaction in any specific situation, and all you can do is get as much data as possible to pick the choice you think leads to less harm.
comment in response to
post
Every job I worked has done self evals. Even the restaurant I waited tables at.
When I did government contracting, the direct government employees all did self evaluations.
comment in response to
post
Nullability might disappear if someone signed the new contract they were offering or negotiated a new one. I have no idea. I wouldn't be surprised if those also waived prior debts.
comment in response to
post
Your conclusion seems to acknowledge this. The comparison between the slurs is invalid. But you seem to skip over the premise that's required to get to that conclusion.
/Fin
comment in response to
post
Do both those words fit the technical definition of slur? Yes.
Do they fit the same meaning of slur? No.
It's like comparing a 747 to a woodworking smoother. Both are planes, but it's not the same meaning of plane.
/x
comment in response to
post
For clarity, there is rarely (if ever) one right answer in language. There are usually lots of ways to say any given thing, and any given statement might have multiple meanings.
/x
comment in response to
post
Okay, from reading that and my really shitty legal research, I see the less than 12 weeks from moratorium start means they owe all the liabilities
Also, this can't be a reconstruction or amalgamation, because those require transfer of liabilities, so the contracts are nullable (15.2)
Again, IANAL.
comment in response to
post
IANAL, but 15.1.1 and 15.1.2 require written notice and then 30 days.
I don't know, but I suspect those options died when Unbounded went away.
15.2 doesn't apply to amalgamation and reconstruction, but does apply to takeovers.
I can't find any official info of what this was.
comment in response to
post
With language? Yes.
This isn't moral judgments.
comment in response to
post
Do you think making a false equivalency is being right?
comment in response to
post
Ugh, that still is confusing.
I'm just gonna apologize and try again when I'm more awake.
I'm sorry. I didn't express my intent properly.
comment in response to
post
Ah. I was trying to say that the ridiculous anti-union person was technically correct, not you. You seemed to be backing that position. But being technically correct means that, in practice, they are wrong.
comment in response to
post
Hey, that's Autism/ADHD. I'm not sure if that's supposed to be one thing or an either or.
comment in response to
post
So you're saying that "scab is a slur" is technically correct, but also that how they are using that to compare slurs is inappropriate?
I'm not sure how that's different from what I said.
comment in response to
post
At best, this is "technically correct."
But "technically correct" is a subset of wrong.
comment in response to
post
I hate how common that is. Politics. Religion. Social relationships.
It's the impetus behind the complaints about "virtue signaling."
"You can't really believe what you say. You must have an ulterior motive. Like getting some mystical internet points for your pseudononymous account."
comment in response to
post
Poe's law is undefeated. How the hell can you parody this? Just read the whole thing word for word?
comment in response to
post
Thanks for the confirmation. Byebye.
comment in response to
post
Got it. You know nothing about this topic, but since things aren't as you want them to be, people explaining how things are must be liars.
comment in response to
post
It's all standard stuff similar to what all social media does. Why do you think it isn't honest?
comment in response to
post
You're gonna run Doom on the coffee machine?
comment in response to
post
That's how you know you worked hard. When every layer of clothes you strip off leaves more random outside detritus on the floor.
"Is that an oak sapling? Where did that come from?"
comment in response to
post
I'm not sure I've ever been at a stage of drunkenness where I am that incoherent, but also able to type.
comment in response to
post
You mean the very common knowledge about T&S? Fuck off with your bad faith.
comment in response to
post
The main issue is that that's the behavior of scammers. If you act like a scammer, you will be banned like a scammer.
And most of those spam messages you see *are* scammers. Most of them *are not* Palestinians.
But you've already been told this. So you know it's bad faith.
comment in response to
post
Asking for help isn't the issue.
But spamming the same text as random replies will get someone banned, and that's only on them.
comment in response to
post
*sigh* I have never said such a thing, and no o don't think that's good.
Please don't just make shit up about me.
Yes, there will always be real people that will be caught up in moderation. Most because they violated rules and then didn't change behavior after being warned. That isn't on BSky.
comment in response to
post
Reread it.
comment in response to
post
And now I've gotta rewatch one of the documentaries about the guy that broke Press Your Luck by memorizing the pattern.
comment in response to
post
I'm getting the "donating isn't illegal." It's definitely follow the leader without bothering to think. It's a cult.
comment in response to
post
Ugh. Bye troll
comment in response to
post
Speeding is dangerous. Yes.
Blocking cars that are speeding is more dangerous than letting them speed. It leads to tighter packed cars, more people weaving in and out of lanes, more road rage, and generally, more unpredictable driving.
Driving safety is predicated on predictability.