bilerag.bsky.social
everyone's dissident. making you uncomfortable in your hugbox one post at a time.
39 posts
3 followers
0 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
you don't detect any irony here?
comment in response to
post
The social programs they implement don't equate to socialism, which clearly advocates for complete ownership of the means of production...something far removed from the mixed-market economies of Scandinavia.
comment in response to
post
this is where they nailed you and you're too caught up in your liberal, vapid understanding and cheerleading of "socialism" to swallow the bitter pill that you made an uneducated post.
comment in response to
post
Great, that has nothing to do with Scandinavia since none of their countries are Democratic socialist. Read up indeed my friend.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_....
comment in response to
post
Scandinavian models employing extensive social programs do not meet this definition because they retain capitalist market economies with privately owned industries, meaning they are social democracies, not socialist or engaging in a heckin based "socialism". Read up bucko, buckaroo.
comment in response to
post
Utopian, anarcho and state communism are not diverse types of socialism, but proposed methods or stages within this framework, adhering to the same core principle of abolishing capitalist ownership structures.
comment in response to
post
Socialism is defined as the collective ownership of the means of production and the abolition of private property, leading to a classless society as a precursor to communism.
comment in response to
post
Most of these are revisionist and have nothing to do with social programs existing in capitalist societies, but thanks for wasting your time.
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
Look if you want to create your own definition that flies in the face of Socialism and Marxism that's fine, just don't conflate it with an ideology that hasn't been achieved.
comment in response to
post
Marx would be rolling in his grave
comment in response to
post
No there isn't, socialism is collective ownership of the means of production. It is a goal, not a spectrum. Cope
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
regardless all you have proven is that people who champion socialism have no fucking clue what it means.
comment in response to
post
uh no they're social programs in a capitalist country and marketplace lmao
comment in response to
post
you misattributed to something non-socialist as socialism as if to brow beat anti-marxists over their support of something inherently non-socialist given its implementation within capitalism. perhaps ive raised questions about something you mistakenly confused for something else before.
comment in response to
post
You seem defeated, as if actually thinking about how social programs =/= socialism has had an impact on your brain. I sure hope it has at least, call me a wishful thinker!
comment in response to
post
Its full on capitalism in a world where social programs exist. look up the definition of socialism if you're going to fellate Marx so hard
comment in response to
post
Everyone was trying to pass off social programs as being socialism. Are you being dishonest or are you really that dumb?
comment in response to
post
no because socialism has a very clear definition and it certainly isn't "Social programs existing in a capitalist state." Lmao, research something for once in your life.
comment in response to
post
I see having to admit it wasn't socialism was really bugging you.
comment in response to
post
what you were looking for, isnt socialism
comment in response to
post
"no" is all you need to say, thanks for admitting it isnt socialism.
comment in response to
post
its not socialism lol, all Scandinavian countries have capitalist economies.
comment in response to
post
which isnt socialism
comment in response to
post
mixed economies aren't socialist.
comment in response to
post
so basically not socialism. adding sugar to chili doesnt make it dessert.
comment in response to
post
Then call them what they are; social programs. Slapping 'socialist' on them is lazy and ignores that they’re implemented to stabilize capitalism, not replace it. If they were truly 'socialist policies,' they wouldn’t exist in a capitalist framework at all.
comment in response to
post
thats not really my job or place here, I was simply stating that having social programs within a capitalist economy isn't socialism.
comment in response to
post
something other than socialism, probably.
comment in response to
post
so do most countries. it still isn't socialism
comment in response to
post
so its not socialism then is it? you cant create your own definition.
comment in response to
post
there are no socialist scandinavian countries
comment in response to
post
"erm... BLOCKED!"
imagine being so fragile you need to block the truth out of your life.
comment in response to
post
my loved ones wont be in care trying to shit on white people online and calling people stupid. fuck the old cunt
comment in response to
post
half of the US citizen crimes are perpetrated by non-whites. facts dont care about feelings indeed.
comment in response to
post
you're old and retarded and cant explain yourself
comment in response to
post
hypocrisy? when did the people alive right now do that? just admit you're evil and like importing rapists and murderers because theyre brown