bizoh.bsky.social
27 posts
12 followers
19 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Attacks like that are same-same as the Red Army 1941-43. DE accounts deplore the same repeated attack axis, often at exactly the same time of day! Just sending men to die worthlessly so as to be able to assuage higher command... Tragic.
comment in response to
post
Tariff reversal isn't a return to the status quo ante. Markets now comprehend the economic illiteracy of the Administration and the capriciousness foolishness of Trumpski. In otherwords, there would be many fewer US market buyers both domestically & internationally with still a lot of sellers.
comment in response to
post
Exactly. Economic uncertainty is through the roof. Clear (R) have no sane economic policy. If Senate intervene then there will be constitutional uncertainty as Trumpski will fight it to SCOTUS. Next up Fed independence...
comment in response to
post
The Administration has slapped a 10% tariff on countries that have a trade surplus with the US. WTF is there to negotiate?
As Trumpski has said repeatedly there will be no change in tariff policy. FFS he believes in tariffs. It ain't a negotiation.
comment in response to
post
You are suggesting a foreign export ban to tackle domestic US tariffs? So rather than a fall in sales to the US you would prefer absolutely no sales there whatsoever.
FFS you are more psychopathic than Trump.
comment in response to
post
Tragic.
And you all voted for this nonsense. Twice!
comment in response to
post
None were applied on RU. So irrelevant.
Relevant declining global GDP lowering oil prices, along with other RU commodities will hurt RU. Bigly.
comment in response to
post
Latent (but now destroyed) strength in the US economy which has actually been booming in the near and long term. Except one party convinced the electorate it wasn't having a good time. So now they will be doubly-sad. That's gonna hurt. Bigly
comment in response to
post
You mean the Fed will cut if inflation falls? But how will it fall in an inflationary environment of stellar tariff increases? The whole point is to raise US domestic manufacturing prices of import substitutes. Surely the Fed has to allow this to play out?
comment in response to
post
Look at the root cause of this issue raised by Sen. Paul and discussed in NYT: tariffs by (R) Administration's historically lead to (R) Congressmen losing their seats. Bigly.
So sad...
comment in response to
post
Like OP said about post-war DE, if they have to talk about this, it wasn't them. But in preference, they won't talk about it.
comment in response to
post
er... no.
The markets have much further south to go. And for a lot longer than their hubris can stomach. Any buy on dips is just gonna hurt. Bigly.
comment in response to
post
Because her job depends not on competency but just on providing narcissistic supply to Trumpski.
comment in response to
post
The flipside is as bad for US too. UA have just been waiting for the last of the PDA to be delivered. With (R) not even contemplating a replacement and EUr providing more intel US has no current leverage on UA and thus, effectively ended its leadership role over Kiev.
The most inept foreign policy.
comment in response to
post
What a clown. Is he one of those fabled Americans who has never had a passport?
comment in response to
post
Better off where she is now. That's medieval.
US has decided to return to the medical and political practices of where its founders fled from.
FFS
comment in response to
post
He was lent on that's why he was reading off a script in front of him. Till he went rogue as usual.
comment in response to
post
beneficial
comment in response to
post
Try some basic economics like the headline the OP published.
comment in response to
post
er... IR? FFS
Thank G EU standards are higher. And sure it's a protectionist club making it harder to export to. That was one of the many stupidities of leaving...
And a key reason we joined in the first place. Which was a huge economic benefit..
And why UK will join again...
comment in response to
post
Yeah, but whatabout sales of cheese to JP?!?!
comment in response to
post
Zero. As am well sure you know.
To amplify this can be seen in that VVP wants a new global "security architecture" aka spheres of influence.
Whereas Trumpski is blathering on about trade and mineral deals with RU. He has no concept of where VVP aims for nor what is driving his actions.
comment in response to
post
er... "Trump now makes a U-turn in favour of Putin...". Trumpski's default is in favour of VVP. Always.
This is obvs. as no new UA aid package in front of Congress. He might use carrots to get UA to where he wants. But this isn't a pro-UA position it is always pro - RU.
Watch Bolton on YT.
comment in response to
post
Worse cases are much worse than that.
Outright aid and assistance to RU seems implausible when nothing is with Trumpski. More likely is refusal to sell arms to EUr for UA, let alone direct to UA. Trying to starve whole Westx into submission.
comment in response to
post
Lukashenko is thus entirely correct when he says this would fuck EUr and UA. Entirely right.
comment in response to
post
VVP has this on the agenda for his forthcoming summit with Trumpski. Given how stupid the latter is he wouldn't know what he is agreeing to and thus, VVP hopes he can get Trumpski's sign-off on these revanchist proposals.
comment in response to
post
No, it's because VVP sees the root cause of this conflict as lying in the need for a revised "security architecture" aka sphere of influence for RU over EUr.
This is the talk of pushing NATO back to 1991 borders and obvs. RU control of UA.