Profile avatar
blackcloudsix.bsky.social
šŸ‡ØšŸ‡¦ Army (armour, 25 yrs, 4 x tours, injured & medically retired), MA Strategic Studies, hate partisan politics. Defence, national security, Ukraine & intl affairs. NAFO Fella. My serious commentary is on Substack: https://blackcloudsix.substack.com
2,415 posts 4,956 followers 936 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to post
Now do Admiral King and the BPF.
comment in response to post
Bingo. It’s the biggest collection of idiots ever placed in a position of power. The definition of a kakistocracy.
comment in response to post
She shoulda tased him.
comment in response to post
Canadian here. They can go fuck themselves. Let it all explode.
comment in response to post
We can always hope though!
comment in response to post
He came on to my feed there to try to call me out. His supporters joined in and then he blocked me. He’s a real piece of work. Note his banner pic.
comment in response to post
And it takes training, coordination, communication, aggressiveness, speed, and all-arms cooperation (to the point of integration). Manoeuvre. blackcloudsix.substack.com/p/drones-are...
comment in response to post
It’s all about the LCF (look cool factor) for these guys. Six months is being charitable.
comment in response to post
I just saw that this morning. Decent still. It’ll be a potent force…by 2030.
comment in response to post
MAGA is in a full-scale panic. If you’re looking for some entertainment, there are many memes that can be deployed.
comment in response to post
These are all too realā€¦šŸ˜¬
comment in response to post
Obviously while playing cards.
comment in response to post
Another pearl-clutching academic. Chaser:
comment in response to post
That tracks. There’s a few of these reprobates around. ā€œAnalystsā€ā€¦
comment in response to post
So, should Ukraine be a NATO member? Absolutely. And there’s no real reason that the alliance can’t make this clear. But full membership while the fighting is ongoing is likely a non-starter. Moreover, there are three obstructionist governments that must be dealt with. I wish it weren’t so. 4/4
comment in response to post
* There would be issues surrounding Article 5. Ukraine is actively at war with Russia. Would membership commit NATO to *combat* operations in support of their new member? Many - if not most - countries would be extremely hesitant to take this on. 3/4
comment in response to post
* New members must be approved unanimously. Right now, there are at least two governments - Hungary and Slovakia - that would block membership * I have no confidence that the US would support Ukraine’s bid, given that Trump is in office 2/4
comment in response to post
The SEAD plan would take hold and that would be that. Russian kit is shit, but their tactics are far, far worse.
comment in response to post
I knew the pearl-clutching would begin sooner or later, especially from the usual suspects. I don’t recognize this genius, though.
comment in response to post
The RU military establishment has been junk for decades and their flailing in Ukraine has brought it out in spades. Human wave attacks and artillery. No tactical air, no mass, no manoeuvre, no imagination, nothing. And their strategic forces aren’t any better.
comment in response to post
NAFO is everywhere!
comment in response to post
🤣