blockmd.bsky.social
EM doc. UM ‘08. Letterwinner. Interests: Acute Resuscitation, UM sports, Lions, Tigers and More
183 posts
258 followers
1,269 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
It’s going to be some weird Mormon thing. A whole section of them have this obsession with near death experiences
comment in response to
post
rofl obviously wants those anti trump posts of his to go away
comment in response to
post
I mean... it very rarely goes back on.
comment in response to
post
Thank you for an introduction to this podcast
comment in response to
post
I'm just enjoying that if play .500 ball from here and they got 91 wins.
comment in response to
post
I would not square up with the lone survivor of a town.
comment in response to
post
He’s not. The problem is that he was saying the opposite just a few months ago and his change in tune likely isn’t to make better policy given his bosses
comment in response to
post
Need a NYY without Judge stat
comment in response to
post
So that’s a no, you don’t practice inpatient medicine. The metastatic cancer patient who is intubated and on max pressors who codes isn’t surviving to discharge. The patient on their fourth extended code of the day isn’t surviving to discharge. We can, in fact, reasonably know who isn’t surviving
comment in response to
post
That is not true at all. Do you practice inpatient medicine?
comment in response to
post
The article makes a point how we’re doing way too much cpr in hospitals, and they’re right
comment in response to
post
The date really makes it. Beginning of 2021, about a half million people died that year from Covid
comment in response to
post
You can shock other rhythms, but not defib, in the right situation.
comment in response to
post
Whoever added the rhythms confused me, none of those ever get defibrillated
comment in response to
post
Need a ruling on the Houston Texans
comment in response to
post
Tork, otoh, is underperforming xwOBA. His baseball savant page is nothing but 90th percentile everywhere
comment in response to
post
Javy may have changed some things, but his chase rate is 3rd percentile still (An improvement!) and his xwOBA is .288 for 15th percentile. McKinstry is xwOBA is .315 because of his sweet spot% and bb rate. Neither will continue at the rates they're going, but Javy is primed for a big fall.
comment in response to
post
he's making great contact, I believe. Javy, otoh, lets just enjoy his success.
comment in response to
post
Nah… people here breakdown if it hits 50
comment in response to
post
Mr Rogers though
comment in response to
post
Oberon makes me want this bad.
comment in response to
post
Just wait until you find out how they’re making the ER call consults for them
comment in response to
post
It matters because it’s a cudgel for anti Chinese sentiment, war mongering and etc.
comment in response to
post
ROFL Bluesky likes burn. See ya
comment in response to
post
Well that’s why you’ll accomplish nothing meaningful in your entire life. Good bye
comment in response to
post
Lol flame away buddy no one cares what you say
comment in response to
post
Only if you want to affect meaningful change on the world
comment in response to
post
Shocking
comment in response to
post
Well yeah if you ever want people to, you know, join your group.
comment in response to
post
Could be that. Could be that I have a limit on engaging seriously with weirdos online. Guess we will never know
comment in response to
post
Yeah in the group of weirdos in politics, you stand out
comment in response to
post
No. I really don’t.
comment in response to
post
Holy shit you’re a weird ass dude
comment in response to
post
Why are you voluntarily doing what I used to do as punishment days?
comment in response to
post
People make this mistake all the time
comment in response to
post
Looked like hell and didn’t include the juice
comment in response to
post
Are scientists speaking on this topic speaking in scientific terms or general terms? The answer is obviously the former, and in that framework, it’s possible I will win the lottery today. In other things that are near zero probability but not ruled out, Covid might have come from a lab.
comment in response to
post
The chances of winning the lottery are decidedly significantly different from zero in scientific language.
comment in response to
post
Agreed, but that’s the level you’ve been on this entire discussion.
comment in response to
post
I can’t rule out I’ll win the lottery today either.
comment in response to
post
Well duh because it’s not a bookie. It does say there’s strong evidence for a natural spillover. It’s in the last section of the article so I can see how you missed it
comment in response to
post
Your article does not say “not definitive means considerable probability of one origin”. Your article actually supports my position, maybe you should read it
comment in response to
post
Nope
comment in response to
post
It was argued against, not cut off. You don’t know what happened or how scientists use words like definitive
comment in response to
post
Because definitive is an insanely high level of certainty in scientific language. More probable isn’t a 60-40 split, the betting odds here would be off the board they’re so shifted to natural spillover
comment in response to
post
No one prematurely cut off debate or discussion. That’s bs. Lab leak remains a theory of bad faith actors as well