bobbyfijan.bsky.social
Building Housing for Families
1,136 posts
2,444 followers
2,180 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Someone who likes to watch TV?
comment in response to
post
They give people a reason to imagine a longer-term future in the city and make it easier for them to put down roots in their neighborhood.
comment in response to
post
Family-sized apartments cannot solve every urban challenge. Philadelphia still needs to improve its schools, public safety, and other quality-of-life factors. But these apartments can help.
comment in response to
post
But without larger apartments to grow into, residents feel a ticking clock. Eventually, they leave. Not because they want to, but because they do not see a viable way to stay.
comment in response to
post
It reflects a broader problem of short-term thinking. This mindset becomes a serious issue when we consider who cities are meant to serve. Places like Philadelphia attract people for grad school or early-career jobs, and many come to love the walkability, culture, and community.
comment in response to
post
Developers, lenders, and equity partners tend to focus on short-term, 2–3 year windows. They analyze the current market, identify which unit types are renting best, and build more of those, without stopping to consider what happens if everyone follows the same strategy.
comment in response to
post
Smaller apartments generate higher rent per sf than larger ones. While it’s cheaper in absolute terms to build a 1200sf 2BR than three 400sf Studios, the studios almost always bring in more rent relative to cost
Beyond construction economics, the structure of underwriting reinforces this trend
comment in response to
post
as long as neither of them are on public lands in a downtown
Out in the suburbs where there's plenty of space, that's fine, but not where land is scarce.
comment in response to
post
Well, good luck!
I’ve gotten my councilman, who is very robust NIMBY to agree to the title … so long as it is expensive and high end enough that only other wealthy (but younger) people will be moving in
comment in response to
post
I think the design is good, but the most important part is designing for families … what it looks like doesn’t matter
They can put any requirement they want in terms of materials. And even 2 per unit parking is fine (since that’s what almost every family realistically needs)
comment in response to
post
Thats why you don’t frame them as 3 story buildings. Building for kids hits different. And actually make them for little kids.
NIMBYs are worried about low rent/low cost units
comment in response to
post
I have yet to meet a NIMBY who *didn’t* agree it a good for little kids to walk to existing schools … and everyone knows how annoying it can be for homeowners who live across from a school and experience the SUV pickup and drop off lines every day
comment in response to
post
Can get rid of them on connected units, will be there for end units
comment in response to
post
It’s already pretty low head height where the toilet is
comment in response to
post
comment in response to
post
ID is always touting the importance of designing for "Instgrammable moments"
comment in response to
post
A beautiful chess set at a small table in the middle of this room would be niche, but kinda cool
This is useless
comment in response to
post
I'm pretty sure we can find space to put a "toddler room" in most apartment buildings without screwing things up for everyone else
comment in response to
post
Couldn't even afford to put in-unit washer and dryer 🤦♂️
comment in response to
post
Yes. The largest category being built right now is called Build to Rent.
Every single of the largest asset management firms are pouring billions into it. Massive greenfield development of small rental homes
comment in response to
post
Will some families choose stay in the smaller home? Sure
But the objection “that house is too small for big kids” misses the POINT of a starter home.
comment in response to
post
A “starter home” is inherently one that a family will grow out of. As kids get older, change schools etc then a family moves
Small is a feature, not a bug
Smaller means it’s more affordable so a *younger* couple can buy it
comment in response to
post
bsky.app/profile/bobb...
comment in response to
post
Aren’t we saying the same thing?
I’m saying that even IF you think the building is ugly it should still be built. Which I *think* is what you’re saying too?
comment in response to
post
And I don’t … which just shows that aesthetic preferences shouldn’t dictate whether something gets built or not