brandonking.bsky.social
Hotel Janitor, Philosopher of Becoming, Running for Minnesota State House (MN-20A)
398 posts
255 followers
53 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter
comment in response to
post
Once they see that a warm, beautiful, customized Sovereign Home costs less than a new car, they’ll know. Deep down. Even if they’ve got their name on a deed, they’ll know who’s really free. If your toes are stepped on by housing sovereignty, they were probably on someone's throat to begin with.
comment in response to
post
Because I'm not just offering cheaper homes, I'm offering a new definition of home, one that ends the lie that freedom comes from playing a game designed to keep you leveraged. The MNHSA is emancipation via engineering. Material sovereignty as civic birthright.
comment in response to
post
The only ones who’ll fight the MNHSA are the ones who’ve built their empires on extraction, or those so spiritually colonized by neoliberalism they think a parasite’s approval is the price of citizenship. And those people can’t win on the merits.
comment in response to
post
It cares that it’s yours, that it’s sustainable, and that it doesn’t hold your future hostage to a bank or landlord.
comment in response to
post
Reminder: the Republic never needed parades. Only regimes do.
comment in response to
post
The dream of a sovereign life in a just world isn’t new. It’s ancient. It lives in the bones. In cultural memory. In ancestral silence. I'm not offering utopia, I'm offering a homecoming to what we were always meant to become.
comment in response to
post
Yes, I view it as the Enlightenment vs Endarkenment. Light vs Dark. Good vs Bad. Liberty vs Tyranny. Socialism vs Feudalism.
comment in response to
post
Political campaigns are wild territory legally. If she did this as part of her campaign, Hershey’s wouldn’t have a leg to stand on. Copyright, defamation, all that, basically unenforceable in campaign speech. So yeah, Kat-Kits are legally kosher.
comment in response to
post
people, not its predators. That’s the long arc. Sovereign Citizens, Sovereign Homes, Sovereign Lives. Not ruled. Not owned. But rooted. Connected. Becoming.
comment in response to
post
That’s how we get to Becoming. Not through wage slavery. Not through rent cycles. But through liberation engineered into infrastructure. A world where you don’t owe your existence to a market, a landlord, or a paycheck, but to your own two hands and the society that chose to invest in its
comment in response to
post
Not atomized survivalists, but dignified builders of a post-scarcity reality. Each home becomes a stronghold of the Sovereign Self, yet no one is cut off. The goal is not individualism, it’s voluntary interdependence. Chosen collectivity. Liberty with others, not over them.
comment in response to
post
We’re removing the tollbooth between the human and their habitat. And as these Sovereign Homes spread, off-grid, resilient, regenerative, so too does the network of free people. Not isolated preppers, but conscious co-creators.
comment in response to
post
And you can’t be free if you can be evicted. You can’t be sovereign if someone else controls the roof over your head. That’s why the Sovereign Home isn’t just housing, it’s the philosophical spine of a free civilization. One printed home at a time, we’re dissolving rent as a relationship.
comment in response to
post
In structures you can live in, defend, and pass down. The Sovereign Citizen, properly understood, isn’t trying to escape society. They’re trying to redeem it, by opting out of coercion, not community. Because liberty isn’t just an idea. It’s a condition.
comment in response to
post
This vision isn’t about secession or courtroom tantrums, it’s about something older and deeper. It’s about reclaiming the dignity of self-rule, not through fantasy legal codes or fringe delusions, but through design. Real design. In steel, hempcrete, and solar arrays.
comment in response to
post
And Enlightenment Socialism isn’t a return to old dogmas, it’s the fulfillment of the Enlightenment’s unfinished mission. It’s rational liberty scaled to the stars.
comment in response to
post
The answer wasn’t Marx. It wasn’t Lenin. It was Enlightenment logic taken to its logical conclusion under Transhuman conditions. The Primacy of Life reframes rights as responsibilities. The Sovereignty of the Self reframes governance as infrastructure for Becoming.
comment in response to
post
The Mantle of Responsibility doesn’t ask for obedience. It asks for alignment with your own highest self. Eudaimonia. It doesn’t promise salvation. It promises conditions for self-authored transcendence.
comment in response to
post
It’s the shift from:
“You struggle to survive.”
to
“You survive so you can choose your struggle.”