bravesirrobin.bsky.social
44 posts
74 followers
492 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
How does the model deal with injuries? Arsenal don’t look like scoring 2 v an avg PL team anytime soon, with virtually all their forwards out
comment in response to
post
No FH29 here, so 2nd option pls!
comment in response to
post
Great pick!
comment in response to
post
Errrr
comment in response to
post
Is Nkunku even going to start?
comment in response to
post
I’ve changed my mind on it 3 times already today.
comment in response to
post
Is it that easy? He’s home to Saints but in such poor form. Newcastle defence not exactly watertight.
comment in response to
post
Isn’t it comparing the 2?
comment in response to
post
Brilliant 😂
comment in response to
post
Ah, that makes sense of it! Perhaps we need to set up some mirror accounts like @fabrizioromano.yopro20.com until they start behaving.
comment in response to
post
Yeah, weird behaviour from FFS. Fortunately the excellent @peireweust.bsky.social has posted them.
comment in response to
post
Superb stuff as usual, thank you
comment in response to
post
And Everton v Chelsea had already been confirmed for BGW34
comment in response to
post
My thoughts exactly
comment in response to
post
That’s a ridiculous response & you know it. If that were the explanation it would show equally in the stats for the other referees, but it doesn’t. Such a significant bias for an individual ref over 50+ matches raises real questions.
comment in response to
post
More reds and more yellows and more penalties against, and also fewest penalties for. You can write all that off as sheer coincidence if you want, but if you give it a moment's thought it is at least surprising.
comment in response to
post
Where do you get these figures, as others get different rates? Assume you are looking at one bookmaker?
comment in response to
post
54 of 968 matches is approx 6%. 54 of 1936 teams (2 per match) is approx 3%.
comment in response to
post
No it isn’t
comment in response to
post
Here it is bsky.app/profile/afcm...
comment in response to
post
Mike Dean said they should appeal it
comment in response to
post
If you need some hope, Liverpool only won 2-0 at Portman Road and they only lost 1-0 at the Emirates… may not be a total drubbing?
comment in response to
post
Not a week to go against Mo!
comment in response to
post
Surely more than £40m. They paid £44m for him.
comment in response to
post
Have they really left Saliba behind Harwood-Bellis every week, or is that just this week due to injury?
comment in response to
post
Fair. Was also that I went for Isak last week and betting against Mo twice in a row feels wrong!
comment in response to
post
Brentford’s relative strength at home does not mean they don’t concede many there - it’s more that they score lots. That said, I was on Palmer til the presser, but that little bit of doubt was enough to nudge me to Mo.
comment in response to
post
Because you are deliberately misinterpreting the meaning of “forever”. And they have been in North London longer than Tottenham.
comment in response to
post
Except it wasn’t ’North London’ at all. It was Middlesex.
comment in response to
post
Does this help you understand? en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Municip...
comment in response to
post
The bookies have us winning 4-0 at shorter odds than any Spurs win or a 0-0, we’ve got to do this surely…
comment in response to
post
Still think you’d be mad to go without Palmer
comment in response to
post
You knew!
comment in response to
post
Cheers Rob, appreciate these
comment in response to
post
Injury
comment in response to
post
Like the Estu pick. I don’t have the balls but if you’re going to do it pre SOU is the time.
comment in response to
post
Surely you bench Rogers at Chelsea over Eva?
comment in response to
post
It’s a form v fixture classic! Salah for me.
comment in response to
post
I had 26, you’ve made me feel better! I was praying Isak would be rested (or on fire) last night but not to be
comment in response to
post
Isak
comment in response to
post
Just when I thought it was safe to dump Haaland!
comment in response to
post
More likely than not! Though if it came to it you could probably sell any tics on Twickets etc
comment in response to
post
Ha, this is mine barring maybe Digne & Burgess. Guess it’s pretty template if going without the robot.