bstormer.bsky.social
Checking this place out. I'm sometimes thoughtful, sometimes reactionary and negative, sometimes naively positive, always human.
1,267 posts
303 followers
1,271 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Thanks for being one of the few to point this out, making the case yet again that mainstream journalism is dead. It's ideologically motivated and in part why Trump is president.
This is a pretty easy fact to check.
comment in response to
post
He's the left wing Scott Jennings. He does the same job; lying on behalf of his party with cleverly designed language.
comment in response to
post
The literal only diversity that matters in military conflict is having members on your side that understand the culture of who you're fighting.
To argue otherwise was always idiotic.
comment in response to
post
Complete with the "I read a lot of books" style eyeglasses.
comment in response to
post
Even if that's true, it isn't wildly unpopular as the original post claimed.
comment in response to
post
Fair enough.
comment in response to
post
As much as I hate the Chiefs, and the Pats, those are dynasties built on a strong QB partially through the luck of the draft, great coaching, and a well structured roster top to bottom with few selfish players. Hard to hate that.
comment in response to
post
Good riddance.
comment in response to
post
You can't just agree that screw you your fellow Latinos voted for it so fuck you isn't a mature or empathetic approach?
comment in response to
post
Yeah fuck my nephew whose getting deported, the uncle voted for it.
Real mature.
comment in response to
post
Good for you. The typical progressive blames Amazon for their shopping on Amazon and Meta even though they just shared a picture of their trip to Portugal on Instagram.
It's annoying.
comment in response to
post
This is like every blue city passing a resolution to end homelessness.
Meaningless.
comment in response to
post
Being unpopular on BlueSky isn't an actual data point of unpopularity.
comment in response to
post
Quite literally popular www.google.com/amp/s/abcnew...
comment in response to
post
Playing devil's advocate, the majority of the EO have wide majority support according to polling.
Is this post more hyperbolic posturing or fact based?
comment in response to
post
Least shocking revelation ever.
comment in response to
post
Yup. So tolerant. So into belonging.
comment in response to
post
Huge. Just not as huge. Most notably considering the NFL wants the Bills to move to a bigger market. Kathy Hochul had to use public money to keep the Bills in Buffalo.
comment in response to
post
Check the commercial pricing. Way higher for Chiefs three peat. Way higher.
comment in response to
post
That's ridiculous. It's a three-peat chance. Never been done. That's way bigger.
comment in response to
post
Both rulings screwed the Bills, and both were wrong. That's the point.
If you can explain why a line judge behind the play got the spot and the judge in front didn't, I'm all ears.
comment in response to
post
Rigged may be a stretch. But certainly a Chiefs super bowl is more lucrative to the NFL than a Bills Eagles.
Check the cost of commercials under each scenario.
comment in response to
post
How stupid do you have to be to think an employee joining with students in illegal action shouldn't be suspended? Even with first amendment rights. Balancing test fail, big time.
comment in response to
post
Merchandise and cost per 15 minutes of commercial time. It isn't complicated.
No catch ruled catch.
Side judge with better sightline overruled by obscured side judge and NY on fourth down without obvious evidence.
Stop. It's rigged.