buttoneer.bsky.social
Completely dull. Nothing to see here.
226 posts
67 followers
294 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
The worst thing that could happen is if they added ‘Great’ to ‘Britcard’ because I’d never be able to unroll my eyes again.
comment in response to
post
It probably doesn’t matter how it ends or who wins, only that we tear ourselves apart getting there. Chaos is the point.
comment in response to
post
@danneidle.bsky.social covers this in the last episode of his excellent short series on BBC sounds. The curve does exist but it’s different for each tax and doesn’t have any meaningful labels. It’s marketing not science.
www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/...
comment in response to
post
A Banksy project to paint looney tunes tunnels will do the trick.
youtu.be/U1MigIJXJx8?...
comment in response to
post
The Laffer curve assumes tax rates range from 0% to 100% but the top of the curve could be at any point along that line and will differ for each tax. It’s always used to say we’re near the top and never that we have a way to go. We can’t *know* how much headroom there is for each tax.
comment in response to
post
Nobody knows where the top of the Laffer curve is, they just use it as a way to say we’re too close to the top. That’s its great deceit.
comment in response to
post
Unless you can show me where the top of the Laffer curve is you’re just making excuses. Everything they’ve done so far is tweaking around the edges and we’re long past the tweaking stage.
comment in response to
post
The proper unpopular change should have been to increase taxation and redistribute it to local authorities to make actual change in people’s day to day lives.
Which is not to disagree with your statement but they should be doing a lot better.
comment in response to
post
TBF he tweets or ‘truths’ every single fucking ‘thought’ he has anyway and it becomes headline news so what would actually be the point of eavesdropping?
comment in response to
post
Surely this?
comment in response to
post
I mean how to fight back?
comment in response to
post
How?
comment in response to
post
Like Jesus, he knows you’re Wright.
comment in response to
post
“Whatsa matter you, hey!
Gotta no respect, hey!
Waddaya think you do?
Why you look so sad?
It’sa not so bad!
It’sa a nice a place!
Shaddapa you face.”
comment in response to
post
It’s just a stepping stone.
LGB✂️T now
LG✂️B next.
comment in response to
post
In times gone by we would have had public information films about this sort of thing.
comment in response to
post
The bin men are currently paid more and the council are trying to equalise the pay by holding back their increases rather than raising that of carers and cleaners.
comment in response to
post
I wonder who will be his Albert Speer?
comment in response to
post
I remember Aquarius as an early Sunday evening thing in that dead zone before Songs of Praise. Notable only for its theme tune.
comment in response to
post
Spot on for 1)
comment in response to
post
I had a holiday to the Galápagos Islands about 20 years ago and everywhere I heard echoes of David Attenborough in my head talking about tortoises, iguanas and booby birds. I still can’t believe how lucky I am to have been.
comment in response to
post
Is that a large amount in this context? It looks to me like he got away lightly.
comment in response to
post
Loading guns.
comment in response to
post
I bet they end up with a fifth C.
comment in response to
post
Watershippe Downe
comment in response to
post
“Is everyone ready for Legz Akimbo?”
comment in response to
post
Is it though?
comment in response to
post
Isn’t this the plot of ‘Clear and Present Danger’?
comment in response to
post
Reform are already well to the left of Labour to those who want to believe it. They claim to represent the working man.
comment in response to
post
TV, radio and newspapers manage to ignore them somehow.
comment in response to
post
Judge Dredd often had people trying to fling themselves off hyperscrapers because they couldn’t handle the future in a *gestures vaguely* world. An illegal act of course.
comment in response to
post
Could it be, and hear me out, that your phone thinks you need a PR guru and it’s not about an AI gimmick at all?
comment in response to
post
UK version of Florida Man.
comment in response to
post
Trying not to give anything away… but as soon as he had that odd encounter the story was heading in only one direction and I just wanted it to get on with that. The drugs were a distraction we didn’t need and agree maybe 20m could have been usefully cut.