caiomaia.bsky.social
I recommend pleasant.
https://gizmodo.uol.com.br/author/caio-maia-2/
Jornalista, escritor, ativista.
São Paulo
85 posts
161 followers
211 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Curious on why you haven’t tried it before, and why you decided to give it a shot. Same with me, diabetic for a lot longer (47 years), but haven’t tried it.
comment in response to
post
It’s obviously not, but doing the same things Trump does because he did them before is not a good way of showing people you’re different, even if he did 100 egregious things and Biden did one bad thing.
comment in response to
post
Any book in the Slow Horses series.
comment in response to
post
não é possível, não pode ser real isso
comment in response to
post
There is no such a thing as an “USMNT great.” Just stop.
comment in response to
post
Antes que alguém me pergunte: Bob Dylan não escreve literatura, muito menos Annie Ernaux, que só escreve jornalismo sentimental ruim.
comment in response to
post
Postei isso com menos de 2% dos votos apurados, tá?
comment in response to
post
Qual era o fundamento legal pra anular a candidatura? E por que nossos progressistas (entre os quais me incluo) precisam sempre que a Justiça barre seus rivais? O eleitor não tem condições de diferenciar?
comment in response to
post
Você obviamente não era nascida nos anos 60.
comment in response to
post
Qual não é o problema, é mais fácil perguntar. Livro escrito por IA deve ficar como os dela, talvez não tão piegas.
comment in response to
post
Falta tudo hoje em dia. Principalmente consistência.
comment in response to
post
Sim, é por aí. Acho que sem craque não resolve, mas precisa também ter organização que deixe o craque ser craque.
comment in response to
post
Sem dúvida. O problema é que mesmo quando tivemos algum tipo de esquema ele dependia do craque. Em 1994 e 2002 o esquema era “ferrolho atrás e bola pros craques.” Talvez pudéssemos melhorar se houvesse um esquema, porque os jogadores não são ruins. Mas pra ganhar alguma coisa, acho, não vai bastarz
comment in response to
post
A “escola brasileira” desde Leonidas é confiar nos craques. Nunca ganhamos de outro jeito. Só que agora não temos craques.
comment in response to
post
I’m sorry for all the abuse, I had no idea my comments would lead to this.
comment in response to
post
It’s not!
comment in response to
post
fato
comment in response to
post
This is all he has done for a long time, and unfortunately people buy a lot of his books and he keeps getting invitations to write articles and give conferences.
comment in response to
post
He is one of the 12 members of the Supreme Court, which you call Justices and we call Ministros. But he’s one of twelve. And he has the same power as the other 11. He is influential and politically connected, but all of them are.
comment in response to
post
The posts the courts ordered to be taken down are 1- trying to influence elections through fake news; 2- threatening to promote violence during this election cycle. This is not freedom of speech. Whoever allows this to be published in contempt of a Supreme Court order ir wrong, and has to pay for it
comment in response to
post
I am a subscriber your newsletter, and it is one of the few I open almost every time. The problem with your take on the subject is that you get a few things wrong about Moraes and the way Brazilian courts work. Moraes is one of 12 Supreme Court justices. He’s not even the most influential.
comment in response to
post
Additionally: how much money has he ever invested in Brazil?
comment in response to
post
I could never understand what people like about heirloom tomatoes, probably because they don’t exist in Brazil so I only tryed id a few times .
comment in response to
post
😁
comment in response to
post
Ma'am, Brazil has some decent beers, Brahma is not one of them and this is one of the few things most Brazilians would agree 😄
comment in response to
post
You could and you did write correctly about most of the decision. What I was trying to say is that analyzing a decision from a country with whose laws and costumes you’re not familiar may lead to misunderstandings regarding its application. Which is what I believe to have happened.
comment in response to
post
Again: I'm not trying to pick up a fight, I am, in fact, fan, not hater. I'm just trying to help with contextualization.
comment in response to
post
I didn't make any assumption, I read the text. Problem 1 is people do not read texts, only headlines. Problem 2 is what you said is: "I initially thought that first section couldn’t possibly mean that app stores also had to ban VPNs. But that’s what it pretty clearly says". And this is not a fact.