carre.neocities.org
Despite my own vices, I continue to do various weird visual arts and other stuff. Here until the owners get too greedy like always.
This is my site for now: https://carre.neocities.org
Never put a rebuttal/comeback in your bio.
707 posts
123 followers
298 following
Getting Started
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
(oh don't worry, with all the previous assumptions on me or on my statements, what's one or two more. i do, after all, speak utter gibberish and i believe that marginalised people are beyond reproach!)
comment in response to
post
out of curiosity, why do they make them feel icky, according to you?
comment in response to
post
well, technically, it's the emphasis on "some of YOU may die" versus "a sacrifice *I* am willing to make", in that cartoon, that she is using, to say that, unlike you, she is in multiple venn-diagram circles for the sacrificed in both scenarios.
comment in response to
post
"here is a guide, written as simply as a playmobil construction set manual, on what i have said. the guide says here, here, here and here, that i'm saying this, not that."
Ron: "dude, what's this crazy nesting doll moonspeak and 'arguing about arguing' man, just say you're a loonyleftie come on"
comment in response to
post
i am not sure how clearer i can be, on the simple fact that i'm explicitly not telling you "just go along with whatever a leftist minority says even if another member of the minority says something else later they're all beyond reproach".
you are now not even understanding this meta-explanation.
comment in response to
post
it's unreasonable to mock them for not backing up the image's relevancy.
since the image is really just their reaction to how you've been talked to by me and others and how you have talked in return.
backing it up would then be rephrasing criticisms others like me had already levied. redundant.
comment in response to
post
it's not a label, it's an observation.
to complain that leftism's problem is that it lets any dangerous lunatics have a say as long as they're black or gay etc, is to believe in an old lie because it soothes your closet conservative leanings.
whether im nice enough to tell you that, is irrelevant.
comment in response to
post
but since you know it sounds stupid, why are you wasting time on it as an implication, rather only dealing with what i explicitly say?
do you really need to believe so badly,
that i am roundaboutedly telling you minorities are beyond reproach,
that you're willing to tune what i actually say?
comment in response to
post
however, now that your misunderstanding has caused you to complain that dumb opinions in the left are because they'll let any crazy marginalised member have a say without reproach, you will now rightfully be seen as a 2014-era internet-conservative complaining about social-justice-warrior wokeness.
comment in response to
post
it is not gibberish. you have simply brought up the marginalised yourself repeatedly to their faces as though they are not from those groups.
telling you that you, did this, is not, as you misunderstand, telling you to just believe the first marginalised person you see and blindly believe them.
comment in response to
post
unfortunately, now that you've misread that stress upon marginalisation that way, and tacked on a complaint against general leftwing minority oppression discourse, you rightfully risk being seen as also trying to inject 2014-era anti-"sjw" internet-conservatism into your pragmatic-liberalism stance.
comment in response to
post
oh, the stress upon the marginalisation is not in some naive all-or-nothing belief in grabbing the first one you see and running with that. it's because the way you personally talk about them always sounds like you can't even tell when they're in the group and/or are speaking from experience.
comment in response to
post
so now, not only "terminally-online"-leftist khamala-critics are just as racist as maga… but even liberal-prog obama-critics are just as racist as maga as well?
what's next, independents who rolled their eyes at a thomas sowell quote?
a commie cashier that gave condoleezza rice the stink-eye?
comment in response to
post
again, you have been arguing with the marginalised people this entire time, ron.
comment in response to
post
you're gonna flip when you hear what even many not-online-left liberal progressives say about black expresident barack obama these days
comment in response to
post
You should apologise to the marginalised you've argued with.
Arguing with members of the various, "fewer losses" groups.
To their faces.
Often as if you, Ron, couldn't tell/believe, they were from those groups.
To argue about saving the many vs the few, you have to look the few in the eye, Ron.
comment in response to
post
ahh, M E R M A I D 🎲 who has to W I N A C O O K I N G C O N T E S T 🎲against the E M P E R O R O F T H E M O O N 🎲so she can F R E E H E R P E O P LE 🎲 it is then
comment in response to
post
whatever happened to just using those sites or tools that just roll various dice for keywords and topics
comment in response to
post
normalizing constant trolley examples where palestinians, transsexuals, etc, are added, removed, swapped on the rails… is the true tactless, naive, condescending, detached edgelord behavior in the 1st place.
mockery of it, often by the members in the image, is at worst merely responding in kind.
comment in response to
post
(Et, honnêtement, pour un directeur de magazines sur le numérique… si c'est trop dur, pour lui, d'utiliser les autres méthodes connues, qui sont aussi instantanées que la fonction "Suivre"… on peut peut-être justement se poser des questions sur son métier et ces compétences ;))
comment in response to
post
Les 'ricains LGBTs et racisés ont pu le faire aux journalistes anglos sur les réseaux ("Do not directly follow J. Singal").
Les mêmes arguments s'appliquent. Faire son boulot sans aider l'enemi.
Le monde du journalisme est déjà assez pourri et collaborationniste comme ça ("bfmtv, tu sors").
comment in response to
post
i read through some of the inaturalist forum threads linked in that article, and some of the posts on the matter, such as this one by hawkparty, are very good. forum.inaturalist.org/t/what-is-th...
comment in response to
post
firefox on linux desktop working fine for me
comment in response to
post
i watched how-to tutorial on flash as a kid by an american guy who used one of his own Hit That Crazy Saddam banner ad games as examples and he would go through it in an slightly self-admiring don't-wake-the-parents-in-the-next-room throatey voice
comment in response to
post
this post's language and context is like if every Gritty avatar user spoke in a single hivemind voice
comment in response to
post
from going down the rabbithole for context, these older stories on the hatesec man & his circle seem to further justify the woman's behaviour on him, & this other woman uses the "8 month" age of hunter's post not to handwave due to age, but to emphasise hatesec's efforts to avoid guilt regarding OP.
comment in response to
post
If anyone can send any via Paypal, we … probably don't have enough in the bank account to make it a whole week. paypal.me/utilitarienne
comment in response to
post
well, technically, if you mock the american fascist woman's generic old rich girl face surgery, it's less ethical, less focused, more rightwing, and more limpwristed, than if you simply mock her for having a health crisis that can prevent her from causing further harm.
comment in response to
post
this is less about the female nazis themselves and more about validating the watercooler-redditoid-male validation-addicted menchildren who tug on random strangers' pants asking "mommy say im a good boy mommy please mommy" with the same mentality of men who focus on hating homosexual pedophiles 24/7
comment in response to
post
ⓘ Well I Never… THe Cheek of It All, I Daresay
comment in response to
post
"okay but THIS rightie is just a misguided victim unlike the other righties" -- ancient western proverb
comment in response to
post
Du côté anglo, il y a entre autres pivot-to-ai.com (le nom est sarcastique), et le podcast d'Ed Zitron.
comment in response to
post
prints: www.dustyrayart.com/product/mess...
comment in response to
post
ai orson welles just refusing to read any of the prompts and ranting for 1 hour that it's because they all have shit mouthfeel when said outloud
comment in response to
post
"buhh i go to many rich people parties howuzzazzposed to know" exactly
comment in response to
post
and a third point, where, even the truly clueless ones, are walking examples of how communities of influential people should not exist, because they become total airheads that don't do background checks, and just go to random lavish parties without thinking, like slackjawed grinning idiots.
comment in response to
post
Found it; Circles, by Manfred Mann's Earth Band.
youtu.be/-NyGU55Qszs
comment in response to
post
They should make military history guys who wouldn't enter a frenzy and eat everyone else alive in a stuck elevator, it would make it easier to interact with illustrators who draw military history.
comment in response to
post
however, does not fix disabled screenshare in updated 0.0.87, and freezes discord when attempting to screenshare.
comment in response to
post
(Steps clarified)
With #Discord not running,
in folder "~/.config/discord/0.0.87/modules/discord_voice/",
remove file "libopenh264.so.8" (preferably move to somewhere else, not delete),
copy file "libopenh264.so.6",
rename copied "libopenh264.so.6" to "libopenh264.so.8".
Mic should now work.
comment in response to
post
been seeing a few people i know who play monhuns saying "okay guys you mightve put Too Much Story Between Gameplay even before taking into account the quality of the story" for this one, even people whod been enjoying the newer formulas
comment in response to
post
i liked playing russian roulette with older versions of openshot on my previous OS to find out if they would utterly shit themselves in new ways. sadly i think last i checked they're functional now and so is my OS